PanthersATL

West coast teams typically travel the most. this is a nothing burger of an annual article

It’s in the schedule release thread

There are inexpensive 9-volt water sensors that you can place near A/C and water heater units. While not smart-enabled, they'll do the job of alerting you (assuming you're home) of an issue. Not everything needs to be smart. Perhaps for a vacation home or BnB rental you're managing - that would make some sense for smart monitoring.

Peter king suggests it may not be Carolina v Chiefs in 2024, if the Panthers say they want to lock that game in for Charlotte vs overseas

The whole piece could be summed up as a haiku (King's signature sign-off): Young, as a freshman Shifted the line to the left Can't deny, he's smart

That King has bothered to write *another* piece on Carolina in so many weeks should be an indicator of the positive movements we're seeing this off season.

yes. that's what was said.

NASCAR is designed for sponsors. I get that. I am referring to more like the ALLY or AMERICAN INSURANCE team jerseys for soccer. Not a fan.

Besides -- when sponsors get TOO involved in the gameplay, we could end up with this:

Sponsor names on stadiums? I'm fine with it. Sponsor names on player gameday jerseys? Not so much.

FTX Arena has left the chat.

Doubful. Oktoberfest is typically late September... and maybe the first week of October, depending on timing. Our game is likely in November 2024.

Can't imagine we'll be doing a ton of 4th and 1 QB sneaks or jumps over the line

munich is awesome NFL in europe is awesome to make a vacation out of.

The Duke's Mayo Bowl committee has entered the chat about sponsorships and naming rights

That's the way it's supposed to be. Which is why TB played a home game overseas in 2022 and AFC plays their home games there in 2023.

No, not convenient at all. but always totally worth it.

I’ve driven 4 hours each way on a Sunday (including time to tailgate), and I know others who have done it too. sure, it’s not something done often, but it’s totally doable.

Sounds a ton better than the previous regime's playbook of "Hand the ball to CMC, or throw it somewhere"

Too tight of a timeframe to tie it to a new stadium (if a new stadium is going to happen -- which may or may not). Doubtful it would be Samsung -- any tie-ins would have to be with the carrier vs the device, hence t-mobile or verizon (AT&T is already taken), because that integration is easier and more likely to showcase connectivity for potential new customers vs people without a device not seeing a benefit. Samsung could be the "official Big Screen", but I can't see them as being stadium sponsor.

Sunday ticket isn't for people who are local to their favorite team and can watch those games already. On the other hand, if you are a season ticket holder who lives outside the traditional broadcast area -- well, that's a different story.

Wonder if the NFL would allow "POONATS" on a personalized jersey?

Source:

UPDATE: you can utilize "family group" logins to allow a "family member" to "share" your NFL Sunday Ticket account. (as opposed to having others utilize your personal YouTube login) BUT each "family member" must "live in the same household". What this means is that each "family member" must occasionally log in to the YouTube TV account from the primary address/location in order to maintain access.

The BOA sponsorship ends with the 2024 season, so this isn't really a premature conversation. I expect it to be a major talking point next off-season after we see how successful the new regime is vs previous years. Better team = higher demand to be associated with it Other reports suggest an increase to $8-10m/year, which may lean towards a 10 year contract vs BOA's 20 year investment. I can't see a company paying $200m (20 yr at $10m, assuming it's a one-time payment) and there are only so many businesses that can fork over $10m/yr without issue https://www.espn.com/nfl/playoffs03/news/story?id=1710458