MHS831

No, and you have good points--however, part of his appeal is the 50/50 ball--how he wins those--when pressured it would seem that the QB would rely on a tall WR who can grab those passes--but I can't say that I saw the game. However, the original post presented stats--so I used stats to analyze his effectiveness in big games and against top level CB play. It is a team sport and when you struggle, it is rarely just you, as is the case when you have a 300-yard day. So if you use stats to present your case, I will examine the stats.

It is a leap--but we have to read the tea leaves. Think job interview, not golf. If he said, "I never watch football on TV and I only watch film when I have to..." That does not suggest a love for football. Maybe he loves playing football--you are right--but the tea leaves say he does not. My son never watched basketball on TV and liked playing it. As a sophomore, playing on varsity, he was all-county as a 5-11 forward. So I get it. It baffled me. I wonder if Dan Morgan watched film? I wonder if he watched football on TV? How much can you love football if it only interests you when you are playing? I see it as a red flag--but you could be right--but if I am spending a first round pick and millions on a player, this would bother me.

You bring up good points that could be looked into more carefully. I heard what he said--you have gym rats and film rats--and they are the people who are willing to do more than they need to do instead of what they are merely required to do. Stats? Yes. They beat New Mexico, Northern Arizona, Utah, and Houston. They were playing from behind (passing) vs. non starters quite a bit. He had a 300-yard game against New Mexico. A 200-yard game vs. a weak WVU team (6-6) during which they were playing from behind (passing more). Impressive, nonetheless. However, how did he do vs. Colorado and Hunter at CB? 38 yards. Maybe he should have watched more film. What about the big rivalry game vs. ASU at the end of the season? 68 yards. What about the big win vs. Houston, a team that was ranked 10th at the time? 50 yards. Brigham Young was ranked 14th when they played. 78 yards. these are not bad numbers, but against the top teams, he was pretty pedestrian. To me, that is why you watch film--you watch for tells or mistakes your opponent makes--you look to find some way to beat your opponent. His stats were good, but if you take out the two games vs. bad teams, (over 500 yards) he averaged about 80 yards per game on a team that was throwing a lot because they were behind a lot. If you look at the game where he was facing the equivalent of a #1 CB in the NFL, he got shut down.

Princely is supposed to go off the board between about 35 and 50, which suggests that the Panthers could move up for him--especially if they move back in round 1. I REALLY like this edge for the Panthers. Not sold on Walker (love the kid), Stewart (big ole bowl of NOPE), Williams (too much unknown about him, but he is a stud)... The film shows a pass rusher who operates best with his hand in the dirt in wide alignments where he can maximize his length and burst. His third-down impact jumps off the screen – the way he embarrassed Georgia's right tackle with a lightning-quick first step before countering inside showcases exactly what he brings to an NFL front. Moving him around the formation unlocks his versatility - he's got the juice to threaten the edge and enough savvy to loop inside on stunts, creating constant confusion for protection schemes. When studying his season-long progression at Ole Miss, his technical growth under position coach Randall Joyner stands out. Early in the year, he was winning primarily on pure athleticism. By November, he was setting up tackles with deliberate rush plans, shown perfectly in that three-game stretch where he racked up six sacks using three different signature moves. The consistency in high-leverage situations - third downs, two-minute drills, red zone - demonstrates a rusher ready to contribute in crucial passing situations from day one. After breaking down over 500 snaps, Umanmielen's blend of physical skills and technical refinement suggests a player whose development is still on a sharp upward trajectory. His dominance against SEC competition wasn't just about winning with athleticism - it was his ability to string together multiple rush moves and counter effectively when his initial plan failed. In the right system that lets him pin his ears back and hunt quarterbacks from wide alignments, he has the tools to become one of the premier pass rushers in this class. This suggests he is a learner and will work to get better. Now, the other teams that like him according to this tweet --Atlanta (picking 46th in round 2), Tampa Bay (picking 53rd in round 2), and Green Bay (picking 54th in round 2) will pick before the Panthers in Round 2. If you see Carolina trading up in in round 2 to around 43-44-45, it will cost them both 4th rounders (estimate). However, if they have a S, Edge, and WR on days 1 and 2, the fourth rounders would be worth it.

I d take him off my board after watching this---he does not have the humility and work ethic--he will get embarrassed as a pro.

I am warming to the idea for the reasons you give--he is a "sure thing" compared to those you name--you can use him all over--like a WR if needed--he is a dawg and baller. And there is no real top drawer edge rusher there at 8--a hybrid and 2 underperformer/high risk players

And the sleeper in all this is Egbuka.

You peaked my interest. He is now on my "list" of players to research.

The fact that I did it too may confirm that accusation.

It is like playing old maid--I am scared the Panthers will pick him. I would rather have Mykel or Jalon--but I see Stewart dropping....This draft is going to be SO interesting from top to bottom.

I am not liking what I see at #8--but move back like you say and grab a S and an Edge or OT with the second---yup.

He and Mykel Williams bother me--I understand that Mykel was a 3-3-5 DE a lot, and that could hurt his productivity-but then you are basing a top 10 pick on unseen potential---just scary. I hope we can move back.

I have Smith and Moose. Who else? Moore?

I am afraid of Jalon Walker, to be honest. Love the kid, the player--but not a refined ILB and not a refined edge. He is only a stud if used correctly, and that skillset may not be as effective in the NFL unless he is an elite athlete. I just see up screwing him/it up.

what was this? Oh the hypocrisy!!! (kidding)

who was the third? I count 2.

I am not a fan, but they should kick the tires. Any player who brags about not watching film is an idiot. You are basically saying, "I don 't need to..." but it is a work ethic concern. I see Bust all over him. The thought I have had is their interest in Nick Emmanwori with Moehrig on the roster-they are similar players--but both can play deep, cover WRs, and are great in the box. Imagine how we could bring either S into the box while the other plays center field? Blow up screens--blitzes--2 deep--shut down TEs and play more man underneath---I am seeing it for the first time. My doctor called it an "epiphany" and wrote me a prescription for it.

I love this safety---Oh my---he takes better angles than a LB....

When I hear they are Samoan, I immediately upgrade my opinion of them.

Scouting Report: Summary The tape shows a player whose future in the NFL lies inside at guard, where his massive frame and power-based skill set can be maximized while minimizing his athletic limitations. Savaiinaea's experience at tackle provides valuable versatility, but his combination of size, power, and technical refinement projects him as a potential day-one starter at right guard in a gap-heavy run scheme. His proficiency in pass protection will translate well to the interior, where his patient hands and natural anchor will shine against defensive tackles. While he needs technical refinement in the run game, particularly with pad level and leverage, his raw power and understanding of angles suggest significant upside as he transitions inside. Smart money has him landing with a team that emphasizes downhill running and values offensive line versatility, potentially stepping in as a starter by mid-season of his rookie year. Given his frame, technical foundation, and three years of high-level starting experience, Savaiinaea profiles as a solid day-two selection who could outperform his draft position. His ceiling might be capped by athletic limitations, but his floor as a reliable interior starter makes him a valuable investment for teams looking to solidify their offensive line. This site (NFL Draft Buzz, I think) projects to G.

Have not read the thread: Yes, the Jacksonville Jaguars are reportedly "all in" on drafting wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan, with some mock drafts even projecting the Jaguars to select him in the first round, specifically at pick number 5

No, I can watch either--one is south and the other is southeast. I am pissed. I have never not been able to find the Canes--

yeah because I am watching a bunch of dudes yapping about baseball.

The Hurricanes are always on here--I looked on ESPN and it said "Blackout"