MHS831

I think you have to wait until we see what Atlanta does. We may not want to move up for Lance.

he processes quickly, he fits their system. When on the big stage, he produced. Why not? Lance is POSSIBLY the most overrated QB in this draft,and I think he could be good if developed properly.

Those trembling lips--such realism. How did you know? I wonder if my true identity has been compromised.

Believe, Shocker. You gotta believe.

If this means Miami at #6 (Philly's spot) is not taking a QB, nor is Cincy at #5, then Atlanta and Detroit are our only obstacles, barring no trades.

This reminds me of another Jones going early in the draft, way earlier than people thought.

I been telling you nice lads that Jones is in play. You poo'ed me. Poo'ed me I say. Well, who is pooing now?

This could be a blessing---wonder if the fans that drafted Mitch Trubiski were elated after the trade up?

I see SF taking fields--more durable than the frail Garrapolo. Lance? Not as durable. They are tired of injured QBs

Don't poo me for this, but a T or stud CB in round 1 and trade up for Jones in late round 2 (if he falls) is possible. Some say Lance will fall.

You ever heard of "between the hedges?" (that's all I got)

Not the way a hedge fund manager thinks.

Maybe this means we are getting Watson.

QBs taken later could be good--Dak, Wilson, Brady, Brees, Carr, Cousins---it could be a good move. He has the skills--just needs consistency etc.

Perhaps, but not intentionally. I think I am going to start combing she/he/and it to cover my bases. S/H/IT

Thought this was about me--college (self-proclaimed) nickname. (nobody called me that, but I tried to get it to stick)

And on this day, "Jaguar" becomes a verb to substitute for another verb that is also used as a noun, adjective, and somehow, a preposition.

Do your homework on Hudson--head case? https://theathletic.com/1134683/2019/08/13/coach-called-me-a-liar-mom-michigan-cincinnati-remain-at-odds-in-the-james-hudson-saga/ Smith is not a second rounder, imo. I think he will end up as an NFL G. The second round LTs are not without flaws---Leatherwood maybe?

Wonder how many Jets reps will be in attendance? If there are a lot of coaches, you have to wonder if they are comparing him to Darnold.

I think we are waiting to see if the QB picture clears up so we can sign a free agent--QB or CB. LT: Erving and Scott (slightly below average) LT: Rookie like Leatherwood, Erving, and Scott (average) CB: #1: Jackson, #2 Pride (below average) CB: #1 Top free agent, #2 Jackson: (slightly above average) By adding a #1 CB, you get better at 2 positions and have better depth that can play. By adding a rookie starting LT, you may improve at LT, but you bury recent signees Scott and Erving. That just does not sound like the plan that is in place. They are deliberately (it seems) not addressing CB--with any sense of urgency or significance. I have to think we are looking at QB, CB, then T. I am guessing that they will take a look at Scott/Erving for a year because they feel as if they have upgraded LG.

He was my secret second rounder if we did not go T

I am going to guess that we sign a CB today

Ever notice how everyone jokes about the kicker until the game is on the line and the team is lining up for a 53-yard FG to win? I am a bit surprised they are not valued more--how many other players (aside from the QB) determine the outcomes of games more than the K?

If he is on the roster, He will be starting opening day.

New helmets