MHS831

Well said. On top of losses in free agency and trades last year (Burns, DJax, YGM, etc). This team had nearly 100 starts lost to injuries. I think he will be fine, but I am concerned about his "bend don't break" approach--one that could be based on personnel and not philosophy. If you give him some defensive weapons he will attack. In my view, DT (NT) is the biggest need, and DE is next. Edge is a problem, but with Clowney and a healthy Wonnum, not so much. We need an alpha safety. A stud, run-stuffing ILB. Re-sign Jackson (CB). It was not fair to evaluate Evero after this season--we are concerned, but the greatest coach in the world would have been abused with these holes. I think you have to be careful evaluating players that depend on others doing their jobs in order to do their jobs. I can say this with a fair degree of confidence: Ray and Tuttle sucked. That impacts the rush from the outside and it creates traffic for your ILBs to hunt. I think we can "over fix" this. Fuller? (UFA and his numbers were not good-but we shall see) We need a few safeties, fwiw.

A lot of folks seem to think that Mays is not that good despite his performance numbers since taking over. Reason? He has been labeled, in my opinion, and that is preventing some from seeing Mays as a legit OL. He played nearly every position on the in college at Georgia and Tennessee. This should help him as a center calling blocking schemes. He started here at OG, where he struggled, and many of you sealed your opinion of him then--he was 24. Ryan Kalil played G his first season and he was not good. So now he has transitioned to one of the positions he has the least amount of experience playing--C--and he has been good for 11 games. During that time, the Panthers got Bryce back at QB and the last nine games of the season the Panthers went 4-5 and if Legette catches that damn pass, they would have posted a winning record. Number of sacks surrendered during the 11 games this season? 0 I am not sure why anyone is questioning Mays and acting as if we need to upgrade.

The last few games (scoring 30+) showed that--and you have to think Sanders will be improved in year 2. We could use an elite TE, in my view, to give Bryce another weapon, but it does seem to be more of a luxury than necessity at this point. I don't see but about 3-5 TEs in the draft that would move the needle here, and I think we have seen signs of player development on the roster at a level we have not seen before in Carolina.

I think we found our QB, and he was on the roster. We found a starting Center I think we found a starting LB (Wallace) and we may have found a starting CB (Jackson) and I think a possible depth or nickel CB (Bartholomew). An undrafted Rookie because a key part of our offense (Coker). We seem to have gotten good play from our 2024 draft's third and fourth round picks. Our biggest weaknesses: DL (I think DT/nose is a huge weakness that can really make us better if addressed properly) DB (We have 1 safety returning; need to re-sign Jackson and add some CB help) WR (We could use an alpha) Edge (A rookie to play with Clowney and Wonnum for a season) LB (Jewell and Wallace were below average--but playing behind a below average DL--I think we need an ILB) TE--A stud would improve this offense. Give Sanders time, but we could use 2

If you don't realize what a great job Mays did, you don't watch OL play. He was better than Corbett, he beat out BC when Corbett was injured--and Mays had been playing G as well as C--yes, it helps being between two stud Gs, but his pass blocking was very good. Overall grade, PFF--Lewis 72, Hunt 67, Mays 66. Pass blocking? Mays ranked higher than Lewis and Hunt. Compared to Corbett: Overall: Mays 66.1; Corbett 62.9 Pass Blocking: Mays 74.9; Corbett 66.8 Run Blocking: Mays 66.9; Corbett 59.3 Salary: Corbett $10m; Mays $711K (RFA entering 2025). Mays may have contributed to Bryce's turnaround more than anyone else-- Mays will improve when he learns better technique and gets familiar with just 1 job. He is 25. Let's not create problems that do not exist.

I am seeing Vrabel, Johnson, and Saleh as the 3 hottest candidates. Many see Johnson as the most coveted--but I disagree. Johnson is a technical guy--a creative offensive mind who has not been a head coach yet. I think Vrabel or Saleh are better choices because they are more about culture and seem to have the respect of players. I also think Vrabel might be making a mistake going to New England, I think he is the best leader of men--followed by Saleh. Dan Campbell is not a football genius, but he knows how to motivate. He gets family and the power of the locker room. Having said that, Johnson needs to go to a job with a solid culture--not one that is in disarray. After the presser in Jax with the owner who threatened to fire his GM while sitting beside him on national TV--that is not the job for him. I also think Brady needs a more solid environment, but I am not sure he is head coach material.

Winston has the highest completion percentage in NFL History, if you count interceptions as completions. (Positive?)

I am the same way--look back at the draft history of the Panthers and see how many fourth rounders stuck--While I agree that we need all the picks we have to address needs, backup QB is a VERY IMPORTANT need. While people do not want to spend a draft pick on a QB--I think the best value in round 4 might be QB. Besides, backups cost more cap room than a mid round rookie--so what you lose in the draft you gain in free agency. We have coaches who have developed QBs--and other players. Let them do their work. The concept that a third year QB needs a mentor is myth. They can develop just as much by mentoring a rookie--and there are these things called coaches (often former QBs) who can do that. THIS DRAFT has some strong, developmental QBs that should be available in rounds 3 and 4. The Pats drafted Brady when they had Bledsoe--same thing. I want my backup QB trying to win a starting gig, not looking to stave off Shady Acres.

Definitely want a guy you can count on for a few games who gives the team a chance to win--I see that perspective. My view is the backup needs to be competing and developing for 3 years from now, when Bryce may be a mediocre QB asking for $80m. In addition, his success has been a relatively short stretch; we don't know if old Bryce might return. I would like to be grooming a backup to be an NFL starter (here or elsewhere) than keeping a guy out of retirement. But there is benefit to any approach, and what I like probably matters little--Cousins behind RGIII, Brady was drafted when Bledsoe was a big name, The Niners drafted Purdy when they were grooming Lance, etc. If you sign a 38-year old veteran, you don't develop the backup QB. Here, we seem to be able to develop QBs (Coach has the rep for developing QBs), so I would like to see us prepare for an uncertain future and use the talents we have on the staff.

My deepest apologies. To be honest, I was thinking team name--not 6th grade geography map. But i did say "from" and you were within your duty and right to step in and clear up this calamity.

I think about the temperament of the player as a backup, and this is a fairly impressive list--for backups. Could be the way we go. Right, I think. The problem with a veteran backup qb is they make $$$. Several backups in the NFL right now make $6-8 million. Good work if you can get it--I am interested in your idea--I mean Brock Purdy was one pick away from this. Most of the available backups this year are not going to save your season should your starter go down--so why not get a young guy who is motivated instead of some older person who failed and is now half coach, half mentor, half player--(never was good with fractions).

Rourke is my top choice--but I had my eye on Howard earlier in the season when he was not on top 100 boards--now he i creeping up--a good game or two down the stretch for him could send him into the second round.

True--you have to compare him to the others and see where he fits in-- In addition, if you recall, Chuba had terrible hands during his first year or two. He worked at it. I was impressed with Legette's route running and I was unimpressed with his hands. I have a feeling he will work on it. In addition, a WR who has a bad QB, change to a QB who has different timing, and then back to the original, reborn QB--it is a bit problematic for some. Legette is a big WR. when he steps up, with his speed, he is going to be a stud.

City--but thanks

We can tell when things are not normal because we don't hear from you--circumstantial, but it causes concern.

Verge vs. the Huddle (not me--you dumbasses)

that does bother me--depth at DT, WR, TE, LB--all seem to be there in the fourth and maybe fifth.

This draft is perfect for this--Beck (stock tanked this year--could be developed), Dart, Howard, Rourke, etc--lotta talent there. I am not sure a veteran clip board holder for $5m is the answer. Get a fourth round rookie for less than $2m--and if he balls out, that is a good problem to have--even if you stay with Bryce, your backup just became a first rounder in a trade.

I would LOVE coaching Green Bay, Buffalo, Seattle, Denver, or even Pittsburgh. I would not love any team from NY, Philly, Cleveland, or Boston. I would hate coaching in Texas (too many idiots) and Florida or California (it is never football weather there) Not sure why--just my perception of the region and team

I met him in Palo Alto as the team (McCaffery was one) boarded the bus to go to the airport to play Colorado. He was monitoring the bus loading. I spoke to him--a kind, incredible human being. He will be a great coach.

And I heard Dallas said NO. I think he becomes a free agent next week...

TIMEOUT!!! This is the time of year Mr. Scot shines. Thank you, and even though your choice of a wife has an upper lip that is stained by the KowAid blue of Jonestown, you are appreciated.

Vrabel will be in Chicago or New England--prolly New England. I have not been keeping up--but that is my thought before getting knowledge.

What a dick.

Wow. I would hate to coach for Dallas.