Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't hold your breath for more no huddle offense...


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

An NFL analyst came on and said that Cam needs to swag out of the huddle and up to the line?

 

I think the poster was saying Cam shouldn't swag up to the line (whatever the hell that means), and should put out more positive energy thereby raising his teammates performance to a higher astral plane. Or something like that.

 

You are probably confused because you are one of those people.

 

Wait a minute...maybe I'm one of those people too! I wonder if it's contagious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully expect Shula to downplay his plans to use a no-huddle or to use a huddle in any interview.  I don't expect any coach to tell a reporter what he's planning to run more of going forward, ever.

Well this is obvious with the supposed two TE sets we were suppose to be using. That's really worked out. More no huddle equals more cowbell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An NFL analyst came on and said that Cam needs to swag out of the huddle and up to the line?

 

Apparently you have zero critical thinking skills. All I heard was the guy talking about how important the QB is before the snap and how Peyton Manning was the best at it in a conversation about the Panthers and no huddle. I didn't hear what he said about Cam Newton before the part I just wrote since I'd just turned the radio on.

 

I never said Cam needs to "swag out of the huddle," I said Cam's "swag" (mindset) is the reason he takes so long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...