Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Points off Turnovers...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

When trying to figure out what has been the biggest problem for the Panthers this season its easy to see the glaring statistic that the defense has given up 103 points this season in four games. This averages out to be 26 points per game which ranks them 26th in the league. For many of us this is unacceptable and even without the Philly game we still are giving up 22 points per game. So the defense needs to play better, tackle better, stop playing so far back on the receivers, and fire Ron Meeks, right? Wrong. One simple statistic explains everything while also pointing the finger at the true culprit of our record this year...the offense.

I went through all four games and added up the points off turnovers that have been given up this season and its unbelievable. This includes TD's scored as a direct result, the insuing drive, or off a blocked punt. I did not include the punt return for a TD because its not techincally a turnover but you get the idea. Here's what I found:

Week 1: Eagles score 38 points...21 were the result of a turnover. (punt return for TD not included)

Week 2: Falcons score 28 points...14 were the result of a turnover. (Dwill's fumble and a blocked punt).

Week 3: Cowboys score 21 points...8 were the result of a turnover. (8 because they went for two.)

Week 5: Redskins score 17 points....14 were the result of a turnover. (Jake's pick and Dwill's fumble)

So, this means that 64 of the 103 points allowed have been because of a turnover. That's 62% of the points that have been given up. Almost all of these turnovers have been accompanied by short fields and some have even scored without the defense even being on the field. (Dallas, Philly). Our defense gives up 26 points a game but the offense's turnovers have generated 16 points per game in points off turnovers.

Simply put, the offense needs to take care of the freakin ball and the defense needs to be ready to defend the short field at all times. This is something that needs to be corrected if we plan on turning it around in the next few weeks. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they played well enough to win against the Cowboys. Technically they only allowed 13 points and its tough to win in this league win the offense can't score more than 13 points. To me its strange because we are returning the same guys from last season on offense, there really is no excuse. I hate to throw out Jake as a scapegoat but defenses aren't afraid of the passing game anymore and are stacking the box and blitzing. The offensive line is another area of concern and should be playing much better than they are. If we can go a game or two without a turnover it will be interesting to see how the defense plays and how many points they allow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...