Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Mike Vick Join Panthers?


Julian17

Recommended Posts

i think he well do good in the team i think we should let jake play 1st half and let mike play 2nd half to see if he still got it the eagles re useing him wrong just for wildcat think he should do better thats why i think he well do better with the panthers i think he old be his old self like he did in altanta lets give him a chance

Should Mike Vick Join Panthers? hell to the no.are you on crack?thats worse than Jake right now:frown2::out::icon_bs::iamwithstupid:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delhomme has been killing our team, wasting Smith's career and I'm sick of it.

Fox did the killing more than Jake with how few times he has the team abadoned the run while they're on a roll & made Jake throw more than he need to. Jake has nothing to do with wasting Smitty's career: it the weak coaching of Fox.

You can bash me, call me names ect but even Dan Morgan said on " Mack & Mack" that it would be a good idea to sign Vick. So I guess Morgan is a troll like the TS?

But if Smitty or DeWill said it's a bad idea to sign Vick, would they be right then? :P :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Vick took Atlanta to the playoffs more than jake did for the team i like Jake but he need to step up and stop thinking about last year playoffs i know it hurted him but if he stop think about the last playoffs we would maybe go back to the playoffs or even the superbowl

You must work for Time Warner Cable customer service...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...