Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Weird Trend


rko396

Recommended Posts

The panthers have recieved the opening kickoff every single week except the week 3 monday nighter against dallas.

week 1 phi

week 2 Atl

week 4 BYE

week 5 Wash

week 6 TB

week 7 Buff

week 8 Ariz

week 9 NO

week 10 ATl

week 11 Mia

week 12 Jets

week 13 TB

Dono if it means anything other then whoever is calling the toss may be the luckiest man in the nfl. since the away captain calls it, we are 5-1 guessing correctly. we may not be very good at scoring, but we sure can dominate before the game starts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm the head coach I'm deferring to the second half every time, especially if I'm the Panthers. First of all our offense plays better when they know they have to score a TD, so getting behind in the first quarter is not such a big deal. Its protecting a lead that we CANNOT seem to do.

Also, it seems to me like, when we recieve the opening kickoff, it turns out that the other team ends up with the ball close to halftime. It is such a killer for a team to score a TD as the half ends and then to get the ball back on the 2nd half kickoff. Deferring eliminates this posibility and sets up the chance to have that for yourself.

Recieving the opening kickoff is stupid. Always defer if you win the toss.

Of course, the Panthers offense has been abysmal in the second half all season, so the point is kind of moot...the chances of us scoring on the drive are not very good. But at least we could avoid giving up 2 scores back to back without even touching the ball on offense. The New Orleans game comes to mind when I think about this scenario playing out. They scored just before half and again on the opening drive of the 3rd Q. We scored 3 points in the whole second half.

Defer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm the head coach I'm deferring to the second half every time, especially if I'm the Panthers. First of all our offense plays better when they know they have to score a TD, so getting behind in the first quarter is not such a big deal. Its protecting a lead that we CANNOT seem to do.

Also, it seems to me like, when we recieve the opening kickoff, it turns out that the other team ends up with the ball close to halftime. It is such a killer for a team to score a TD as the half ends and then to get the ball back on the 2nd half kickoff. Deferring eliminates this posibility and sets up the chance to have that for yourself.

Recieving the opening kickoff is stupid. Always defer if you win the toss.

Of course, the Panthers offense has been abysmal in the second half all season, so the point is kind of moot...the chances of us scoring on the drive are not very good. But at least we could avoid giving up 2 scores back to back without even touching the ball on offense. The New Orleans game comes to mind when I think about this scenario playing out. They scored just before half and again on the opening drive of the 3rd Q. We scored 3 points in the whole second half.

Defer!

Do you have any idea what you're talking about? We are a run-first team that works best when leading. If we go behind, we have to pass. We always choose to receive the opening kick-off so that we can hopefully score and go ahead immediately. That way we can continue to run the ball, control the clock and cause turnovers on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have any idea what you're talking about? We are a run-first team that works best when leading. If we go behind, we have to pass. We always choose to receive the opening kick-off so that we can hopefully score and go ahead immediately. That way we can continue to run the ball, control the clock and cause turnovers on defense.

We're also a defensive team. Putting our defense out first wouldn't be a bad idea. And since the defense plays considerably better than our offense majority of the time, if our defense stops the other team early, it could help pump up the offense. I'm a fan of deferring to the second half (unless I'm playing madden on rookie, in which case it doesn't really matter :D)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we may not be very good at scoring, but we sure can dominate before the game starts

we're great in warm ups! you should see how many 60 yard field goals lloyd hits during warmups. one after another from the 50 through the UPPER half of the goal posts. his kicks might be good from 68. (with no defensive pressure of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...