Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Decent Danica article


Claws

Recommended Posts

I think there's some hatin going on. But i thought i'd add it to the forum for pleasure reading.

By Mike Mulhern

mikemulhern.net

FONTANA, Calif.

Okay, before we get all wound up, again, about NASCAR rookie Danica Patrick, let's remember there are other newcomers in this sport this season.

And Patrick right now appears to have everything going for her....while the other rookies are not only battling the dozen or so Cup regulars making the big Nationwide events but also fighting a vicious economy.

The good news: Patrick's NASCAR debut set the stage for a record-breaking TV audience last weekend. And now she gets centerstage again here in Los Angeles, the second-biggest market in the U.S. and thus a key market for NASCAR, and for years an amazingly hard sell -- as is just about everything here, just ask the NFL.

ESPN reports that more than 4.2 million on average watched Patrick-in-NASCAR, setting a new TV mark for the series, on ESPN2 – with a 3.2 rating.

ESPN says 4,271,365 viewers in 3,170,109 households watched the 300, won by Tony Stewart over Carl Edwards. Patrick crashed out midway, but 2's coverage peaked with a 3.5 household rating the last 20 minutes. That, ESPN's Julie Sobieski says, shows that "while Danica certainly helped bring people to the telecast, she wasn't the only factor.

That 3.2 was up sharply from ESPN's 2009 number, 2.4, and its 2008 number, 2.5. (Point of reference: ESPN's 'overnight' rating was 2.6, in the major markets.)

Okay, that said, what about the rest of the guys. The ones who don't have another career, or two, to fall back on, who don't yet have a 'brand identity'?

One of them is Ricky Stenhouse Jr., a 22-year-old from Mississippi: "I've joked around with my guys that I was going to race around Danica so I'll be on camera."

Hey, not a bad idea.

Stenhouse is one of Jack Roush's two newcomers, along with Colin Braun.

Remember the Gong Show?

Roush, more than anyone in the sport, has made it a point to give promising drivers a shot. He's had 11 rookies-of-the-year – Greg Biffle, in Trucks in 1998 and in now-Nationwide in 2001, Carl Edwards in Nationwide in 2005, Kurt Busch in Truck in 2000, Edwards in Truck in 2003, and Matt Kenseth in Cup (2000). So when Roush makes a pick, smart money keeps eyes on it.

Point: Kenseth's rookie win was head to head against favored Dale Earnhardt Jr. "He had actually beaten me for the Nationwide championship titles the two years prior, so we really focused on earning the rookie of the year title in 2000," Kenseth says.

Sure, sometimes rookies pan out big; sometimes they just pan. For one, David Ragan (2007) the verdict is still out.

And rookies don't come cheap. That's why Junior Johnson used to say he didn't care to run a training school for promising young drivers.

But times change, and while rookies are just as expensive as usual, maybe even more so, well, new talent has to come from somewhere.

Who's the next Kevin Harvick? Remember when Richard Childress plucked him out of virtual obscurity to take over after Dale Earnhardt's death?

Who's the next Carl Edwards? Remember his mid-season leap into Cup racing, and how quickly he was successful?

Now this spring a guy to keep an eye on is Colin Braun. (Ovala, Texas, is where?)

He's up from the Truck series....but his background and his talent appear to put him on the fast track to Cup. Though that big early crash at Daytona took him out last weekend, Braun did win last summer's Truck race at Michigan, a sister track to this one.

Edwards himself, fulltime Nationwide as well as fulltime Cup, and the 300 winner here last spring, isn't letting this opportunity go to waste: " A lot of people think that having rookie teammates is only for us to help them...but actually it's a two-way street.

"When you have someone with the experience on road courses like Colin Braun, that's definitely something we lean on when we testing

road course tracks.

"Colin might be a rookie in the Nationwide series, but he's been to most of these tracks in the Truck series."

Braun makes this step up carrying a rep as a hard-charger...perhaps too hard at times.

"I guess I did have that reputation, of going after it, in the sports car stuff," Braun says. "I came into the Truck deal and tried to do that same sort of thing...and it didn't really work very good. Those old veteran guys pretty much put the kibosh on that pretty fast.

"So I had to rework my style a little bit. But I think I've got it a little bit better figured out.

"I think it worked okay the last half of last season.

"I'm still working on trying to figure out how to race these guys, and what they race like...and now moving to the Nationwide series it changes everything again.

"So I'm going to have to see how the Nationwide drivers and how the Cup drivers race and go from there.

"The biggest challenge is definitely going to be the Cup drivers...having 10 or 15 Cup drivers week-in, week-out, that's going to be the biggest challenge.

"I'm going to learn a lot, and that's going to really help me learn a lot fast."

Point of fact: nine of the top 10 finishers in the Daytona 300 were Cup drivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...