Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another take on our offseason...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Another take on our offseason from Walterfootball.com...

2010 NFL Offseason: Carolina Panthers

Season Summary:

Death, taxes and a mediocre Panthers season following a great one. In John Fox's tenure in Carolina, he has compiled 11-5 or 12-4 records three times. In each instance, the Panthers responded with a 7- or an 8-win campaign immediately afterward. Amazingly, Carolina has never put together back-to-back winning seasons in its 15-year existence.

Offseason Moves:

Panthers sign DT Ed Johnson

Offseason Needs:

No. 2 Wide Receiver: Jake Delhomme should take a lot of the blame for his interceptions, but one reason he struggled was because he had only one viable option to throw to. The Panthers will be hoping that someone like Brandon LaFell or Golden Tate falls to them in Round 2 of the 2010 NFL Draft....

Link: http://walterfootball.com/offseason2010car.php

Discuss...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything accept the jake one, I feel he never really use his other options enough he seem to always get tunnel vision stayed with one person at times. And the difference was shown when M.Moore came in, even though it was 5 games almost everybody numbers went up at each position because he never stayed locked on one person and he use everybody.

But still we do need a number #2WR that position a must!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm they suggest Moore is an ERFA, which im certain he's not. However if he is, then we simply can't lose him provided we give him the vet minimum.

In addition Tyler and Hayden are also listed as ERFA, which again means we have no competition and thus can offer them the vet minimum to keep them.

EDIT

Yeah they are talking crap, only Hayden is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...