Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats in trade talks for Beasley


TouchMeNot97

Recommended Posts

The Bobcats are in discussion with the Heat, Raptors and Rockets about a trade that would send Tyson Chandler to Houston and would give the Bobcats Micheal Beasley and Jared Jeffries in return according to ESPN. Do you guys like this trade? It would give us a log jam at Power Forward with Beasley, Tyrus Thomas and Diaw. However all of the have the ability to play at least one more position. Here is a link to the article:

http://proxy.espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/17823/can-miami-pull-off-beasley-trade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Beasly really want to play NBA ball ?

Didn't he come out with some "Wish I had stayed in College something lately?"

Just saw a bit on ESPN awhile back and wanted clarification.

Deffinatly a good pick up if we can move some useless salary as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Beasly really want to play NBA ball ?

Didn't he come out with some "Wish I had stayed in College something lately?"

Just saw a bit on ESPN awhile back and wanted clarification.

Deffinatly a good pick up if we can move some useless salary as well.

I think he had some depression problems during the offseason last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this happens are updated depth chart looks like this

Center

1. Nazr Mohammed

2. Jared Jeffries

3. DeSagana Diop

4. Alexis Ajinca

Power Forward

1. Tyrus Thomas

2. Michael Beasley

3. Boris Diaw

Small Forward

1. Gerald Wallace

2. Derrick Brown

Shooting Guard

1. Stephen Jackson

2. Gerald Henderson

Point Guard

1. D.J. Augustin

We would still have three roster spots left, which I think should be filled by two point guards maybe Jeremy Pargo and Sherron Collins and one shooting guard maybe take a look at Toney Allen. The only reason I would say get one more shooting guard is because Beasley can play the SF position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Heat and Raptors engaged in discussions for several hours after Bosh and Dwyane Wade announced that they were committing to Miami in a package about the various sign-and-trade options. Discussions were serious enough Wednesday night, according to two sources, that Heat officials told Beasley to start preparing to relocate. One source with knowledge of Toronto’s thinking, however, insists that the four-team trade – which would require Houston to send at least $3.1 million in salary to the Raptors -- is “not happening.” Toronto continues to convey the message that it is a reluctant partner in any deal that makes Bosh’s departure more lucrative.

Source: ESPN.com

This trade will go through when Toronto stops acting like a f*cking child and realizes its better to take something rather than nothing since they are losing Bosh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this happens are updated depth chart looks like this

Center

1. Nazr Mohammed

2. Jared Jeffries

3. DeSagana Diop

4. Alexis Ajinca

Power Forward

1. Tyrus Thomas

2. Michael Beasley

3. Boris Diaw

Small Forward

1. Gerald Wallace

2. Derrick Brown

Shooting Guard

1. Stephen Jackson

2. Gerald Henderson

Point Guard

1. D.J. Augustin

We would still have three roster spots left, which I think should be filled by two point guards maybe Jeremy Pargo and Sherron Collins and one shooting guard maybe take a look at Toney Allen. The only reason I would say get one more shooting guard is because Beasley can play the SF position.

There is no way that Boris is on this team as the 3rd PF. Something has to give there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...