Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ncaa 11


PantherfanB

Recommended Posts

I got it, played only one game so far (Waiting for down-loadable rosters). Ive never done a Online Dynasty. how does it work?

I have ver 1.0 of the updated rosters, you can find the gamertags to get them from if you just google it. Online dynasty works like regular dynasty except players control a select number of teams. From my experience doing a dynasty works best if you do a league like the acc or sec instead of letting people just choose whatever team they want so you can get player vs player games more often and fight over recruits instead of mostly just playing against the cpu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are we going to go with a single conference or spread out? If so the commish needs to schedule the non-conference games well. Also, Pantherfan, what rosters are you using for the dynasty? We definitely need an updated one, at least one with names added.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea, the rosters i used was gamertag CK11

that roster really isn't that good, it has made up players on a bunch of teams because they didn't want to go to the effort of making new players. Theres probably three or four of the transferred SC players that are still on the roster. I would wait a couple revisions till you start so the rosters are "accurate"......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i honestly wont notice made up players. as long as the big names are on the right teams thats all i care about. it seems like pantherfanb just did auto name for the online dynasty anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would set one up but I already started a single player online Dynasty so I could do the recruiting from the PC. If someone wants to set one up with named rosters I would be happy to join, gamertag is theant1h3ro....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...