Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Checkers Hockey


chucktownpanther

Recommended Posts

The upper bowl of TWCA is usually curtained off, and the curtains are opened when necessary.

The arena is made exclusively for basketball, so for hockey they only have room for "horseshoe" style seating. The only real seating that is taken out in this arrangement is the media tables on the one end of the arena.

http://www.gocheckers.com/tickets/seating/

It's not as cozy as RBC, but, for being a basketball arena it is a pretty nice place to watch a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I miss having a minor league team in Greensboro. :(

I was a little too young to remember the Monarchs in the early nineties but I do remember the Generals. What a great rivalry that was. I miss all the regional rivalries the Checkers had in the ECHL before it merged with the WCHL and expanded nationally. Greensboro, South Carolina, Pee Dee/ Florence, Greenville, Richmond...those were the days.

That being said I'll take being the AHL Canes affiliate in Charlotte over the ECHL Rangers affiliate any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man the late 80s, early 90s Monarchs were the rock stars of the ECHL...was an amazing time period. When they went to the AHL in the late 90s it was all but over. Should've stayed ECHL.

And once the Canes rented the city and left, pro hockey in Greensboro died. Every year it seems there's a rumor of Greensboro as a possible place for expansion in some minor league but sadly nothing really comes to fruition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had an ECHL team here for a little over 10 years (Augusta Lynx), then they folded up. We have been without hockey for a couple of years now, but this year, we are starting up an SPHL team.

I hated to see all the teams in the ECHL previously mentioned gone. There were some really good rivalries between us and those teams. I would say Greenville was our most disliked rival.

I am glad to see the Checkers become an AHL team. The quality of play should be much better than the ECHL. I hope to make one or two of their games. I really like the TWC Arena having been there for a game for our old team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greensboro vs. Roanoke man...that was an awesome rivalry. I miss the days of coming home, heading to the Greensboro Coliseum paying my $15 for a ticket and then enjoying a good game. Last game I went to Matt Elich hit a game winner in OT to beat the Roanoke Express. :)

On the way out of the coliseum a huge Panthers chant started up as the next night we were set to play the Cowboys in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...