Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stupid decision


ShizWheat

Recommended Posts

Its funny how the panthers let Delhomme have mediocre games for the majority of his career at the panthers. Moore, however, comes into the season after have a great 5-1 run last year and does the same as delhome. Which the majority of the reason for the bad performance was the defense now being able to stop freeman from scrambling. Anyway, they put Clausen in and he does the same thing as Moore, but it was acceptable because he played for Wise. How gives a poo about that. If they were gonna replace Moore, which they shouldn't, they should put Pike in. He has much a much better college career than Clausen and he played for a much lower profile team. The panthers need to name looking for a name and start looking for performance. And where was stewart. I like williams but stewart should be the number won. He got the power so the middle runs will open up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i do agree. But the results were the same. The think that made him look better was the fact that, for some reason, the running game actually pick up. But i do think that Pike should be the number to. He is a much better QB. He just not as big of a name. But i dont think that we should give up on Moore so early.

Smiff thanks for the grammar correction, now i know how to make my post a lot more coherent because im sure that my point wasn't getting across with the mistake of how instead of who.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its funny how the panthers let Delhomme have mediocre games for the majority of his career at the panthers. Moore, however, comes into the season after have a great 5-1 run last year and does the same as delhome. Which the majority of the reason for the bad performance was the defense now being able to stop freeman from scrambling. Anyway, they put Clausen in and he does the same thing as Moore, but it was acceptable because he played for Wise. How gives a poo about that. If they were gonna replace Moore, which they shouldn't, they should put Pike in. He has much a much better college career than Clausen and he played for a much lower profile team. The panthers need to name looking for a name and start looking for performance. And where was stewart. I like williams but stewart should be the number won. He got the power so the middle runs will open up.

I can't figure out what language to put into Babel Fish.... anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not so much of a hater as i don't think that we should give up on Moore in the second game. They have wanted him to be the starter from day one, just because of him playing for Wise. But just because he played for Wise doesn't mean that he's awesome. Example is Brady Quinn. I think that we should give Moore a little more time. But without an oline nobody will be very productive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its funny how the panthers (capitalize Panthers)let Delhomme have mediocre games for the majority of his career at the panthers (should be Panthers). Moore, however, comes into the season after have a great 5-1 run last year and does the same as delhome (misspelled and not capitalized). [/b](never start a sentance with "Which")Which the majority of the reason for the bad performance was the defense now being able to stop freeman (again, not capitalized)from scrambling. Anyway, they put Clausen in and he does the same thing as Moore, but it was acceptable because he played for Wise. How gives a poo about that (need I even comment?). If they were gonna replace Moore, which they shouldn't, they should put Pike in. He has(had) much a much better college career than Clausen and he played for a much lower profile team. The panthers need to name looking for a name (WTF)and start looking for performance. And where was stewart. I like williams but stewart should be the number won (one, LOL). He (has)got the power so the middle runs will open up.

Yes, you need help with writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How come you claim to know so much about how Jimmy Clausen and Brady Quinn played at ND, and how that's the reason they are getting a chance to play early, but are too clueless/stooopid to know that the coach they played under was Weiss, not Wise.

Furthermore, I guess we should all fill you in before you make anymore foolish comments about Clausen. ND runs a pro style offense which prepares QB's to run a pro style NFL offense, Cincy does not, and that's got ALOT to do with why Pike is the #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How come you claim to know so much about how Jimmy Clausen and Brady Quinn played at ND, and how that's the reason they are getting a chance to play early, but are too clueless/stooopid to know that the coach they played under was Weiss, not Wise.

Furthermore, I guess we should all fill you in before you make anymore foolish comments about Clausen. ND runs a pro style offense which prepares QB's to run a pro style NFL offense, Cincy does not, and that's got ALOT to do with why Pike is the #3.

Ok i spelled his name wrong. but i know that they played under a pro style offense. And that was the point i was making about Quinn. Everyone hyped him up and said how awesome he was, but he turned out to be mediocre. In my opinion, the pro style offense doesn't help you account for the speed of the pro players. and what about the qbs that don't play in a pro offense in college and come to the nfl and have great rookie seasons, matt ryan. Im just saying that i like Pike and i don't think that Clausen should be so revered because of the WEISS factor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...