Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There’s Something About Will Sasso


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/03/25/three-stooges-will-sasso-curly-cast/

will-sasso2.jpg

Will Sasso, start practicing that angry bark. And your shuffling.

The MadTV funnyman, long rumored to be up for a major role in the Farrelly brothers’ upcoming Three Stooges movie, has been locked in as the new Curly, according to a source close to the production.

While it seems obvious that the heavyset, peach fuzz-headed actor would play the heavyset, peach fuzz-headed Stooge, some speculation had pegged him as the movie’s angry, bowl-cutted brother Moe. But Sasso, whose impressions of big, tough guys runs the gamut from Steven Seagal to Arnold Schwarzenegger and James Gandolfini, will be playing the kunckleheaded trio’s great big abuse magnet after all.

Peter and Bobby Farrelly are aiming at a mid-April start date for their 20th Century Fox film, which would be a fictional story using the Moe, Larry, and Curly characters in a modern setting, not a biopic of the actors who originated those parts, brothers Moe and Jerry “Curly” Howard and Larry Fine.

The other two lead roles have not yet been cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...