Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 4 or Bust


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

It's top 4 or "BUST" for us in 2013.

(http://nbadraftroom2.blogspot.com/p/2013-nba-mock-draft.html)

1. Nerlens Noel PF 6'10" Kentucky (Alonzo Mourning)

10815350-large.jpg

2. Shabazz Muhammad SG 6'5" UCLA (better James Harden)

2012-nike-hoop-summit-shabazz-muhammad-26661761573fb391.jpg

3. Cody Zeller PF 6'11" Indiana (shorter Paul Gasol)

68594849-05221601.jpg

4. James McAdoo PF 6'9" UNC (Josh Smith w/ a jumper)

bd27BEm156.jpg

Top Ten Prospects:

-Adonis Thomas SF 6'6" Memphis (Andre Iguodala)

-Myck Kabongo PG 6'2" Texas (Rajon Rondo)

-Isaiah Austin C 7'0" Baylor (better Tyson Chandler)

-Rudy Gobert PF 7'1" France

-Steven Adams C 6'11" Pittsburgh (Nikola Vucevic)

-Jeff Withey C 7'0" Kansas (Sean Williams)

I CANT WAIT!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got it all wrong...

1. PF/C: Cody Zeller, NBA Comparison: LaMarcus Aldridge

2. PF/SF: James Michael McAdoo (JMM), NBA Comparison: James Worthy

3. SG: Kentavious Caldwell-Pope (KCP), NBA Comparison: Joe Johnson

4. C: Alec Brown, NBA Comparison: Marcus Camby

5. SF/PF: Tony Mitchell, NBA Comparison: Kenyon Martin

No you got it wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got it all wrong...

1. PF/C: Cody Zeller, NBA Comparison: LaMarcus Aldridge

2. PF/SF: James Michael McAdoo (JMM), NBA Comparison: James Worthy

3. SG: Kentavious Caldwell-Pope (KCP), NBA Comparison: Joe Johnson

4. C: Alec Brown, NBA Comparison: Marcus Camby

5. SF/PF: Tony Mitchell, NBA Comparison: Kenyon Martin

Why would we take Mitchell, a 6'8" SF not a true PF?

Why would we take Caldwell-Pope, when Shabazz is there?

Crazy :0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all we know Muhammad may stay in school or he may turn out to be a bust. YOU HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN MUHAMMAD PLAY IN THE NCAA!!!

Mitchell is a hybrid, a Kenyon Martin type player. A player that can come off the bench and bring energy and points

If we somehow end up better this year and have a pick in the area of eight through fourteen, Mitchell would be a perfect fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all we know Muhammad may stay in school or he may turn out to be a bust. YOU HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN MUHAMMAD PLAY IN THE NCAA!!!

Mitchell is a hybrid, a Kenyon Martin type player. A player that can come off the bench and bring energy and points

If we somehow end up better this year and have a pick in the area of eight through fourteen, Mitchell would be a perfect fit.

Can you freakn tell me why in the blue h3ll will we take another SF when we just drafted two SF? And if your answer is that he's a PF, why the h3ll would we take an undersized 6'8" PF. Foreal? How'd you even get an internship for Sir Purr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you freakn tell me why in the blue h3ll will we take another SF when we just drafted two SF? And if your answer is that he's a PF, why the h3ll would we take an undersized 6'8" PF. Foreal? How'd you even get an internship for Sir Purr.

He is a 7'2 wing span, that's why

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Tony-Mitchell-(North-Texas)-6229/

Try looking at facts before talking out of your ass, it makes you look like a fool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...