Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

John Elway was...


Jangler

Recommended Posts

Revisionist history + lack of reading comprehension = fail.

Nowhere in this thread did I see anyone state "Jake is just as talented as Elway."

Who would have been the Buffalo Bills of quarterbacks if he hadn't won two superbowls at the end of his career.

Not to mention he was one of the "best" quarterbacks ever but still couldn't win the big one without a strong defense and a great running game.

I know two ways you can compare Jake to Elway. They are both amazing comeback quarterbacks that run the two minute drill as well as anyone has in the NFL.

And when you gameplan around them, they tend to fall apart. Neither seems to want to be in the game until the final two minutes and down by 6 points.

But Jake isn't Elway, and will never be Elway. The Broncos got to the Superbowl early on by virtue of Elway, something the Panthers will never do with Jake Delhomme. Jake alone won't get us into the playoffs the way Elway did with the Broncos.

But to say you can't compare the two, or you shouldn't, that's just plain willful ignorance.

Not to mention Jangler just compared their ages. You can't even compare the relevance of the aging process between the two?

Elway wasn't a god, and if he hadn't won those two Superbowls, he would be as big of a disappointment as Marino, who was a real quarterback.

rep to you (when I get some back:)) Elway was older. I was just trying get people to lay off a little, but I know it won't work.....I don't know what I was thinking. I might have been a little buzzed on the coffee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...