Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is Newton so good on 1st down and so bad on 2nd and 3rd ?


TonyN

Recommended Posts

Cam Newton passing completion percentage by down:

1st 71.1%

2nd 53.7%

3rd 43.6%...this stat is not sortable, but I have looked at all the bad quarterbacks who have played this season and Newton is by far the worst on 3rd down. Worse than Wilson, Cassell, Weedon, Tannehill, Even Blaine Gabbert is hands down better on 3rd down than Newton.

And, of course, as a result, the Panthers rank dead last in the entire NFL in 3rd down conversions.

Now I know the legions of Cam Newton worshippers will call me an idiot and say that these numbers are Ron Rivera's fault...or Chud's fault...or the defense's fault...LOL...but that assertion just does not stand up to scrutiny. Actually they tell a very different story.

When Chud can open his playbook on 1st down Newton can be very good. When it becomes an obvious passing situation Newton suddenly becomes very bad.

I know, I know. Newton is bad on 3rd downs because he is put in long yardage situations because of Chud and Rivera's stupid read option and otherwise terrible play calling.

Here is the problem, though: Newton's completion percentage on 3rd down and 3-7 yards to go is 38.5%. Sorry, sports fans, those ares very manageable distance. And that completion % stinks. It stinks really badly. And there is only one person you can hang it on: His name is Cameron Newton.

Here is an item for your suggestion box, Cam: play better on 3rd down. Play lots better on 3rd down. Because right now you are the worst QB in the league in obvious passing situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam Newton passing completion percentage by down:

1st 71.1%

2nd 53.7%

3rd 43.6%...this stat is not sortable, but I have looked at all the bad quarterbacks who have played this season and Newton is by far the worst on 3rd down. Worse than Wilson, Cassell, Weedon, Tannehill, Even Blaine Gabbert is hands down better on 3rd down than Newton.

And, of course, as a result, the Panthers rank dead last in the entire NFL in 3rd down conversions.

Now I know the legions of Cam Newton worshippers will call me an idiot and say that these numbers are Ron Rivera's fault...or Chud's fault...or the defense's fault...LOL...but that assertion just does not stand up to scrutiny. Actually they tell a very different story.

When Chud can open his playbook on 1st down Newton can be very good. When it becomes an obvious passing situation Newton suddenly becomes very bad.

I know, I know. Newton is bad on 3rd downs because he is put in long yardage situations because of Chud and Rivera's stupid read option and otherwise terrible play calling.

Here is the problem, though: Newton's completion percentage on 3rd down and 3-7 yards to go is 38.5%. Sorry, sports fans, those ares very manageable distance. And that completion % stinks. It stinks really badly. And there is only one person you can hang it on: His name is Cameron Newton.

Here is an item for your suggestion box, Cam: play better on 3rd down. Play lots better on 3rd down. Because right now you are the worst QB in the league in obvious passing situations.

Here's an idea for you...get off NFL.com searching for new ways to keep pushing the same agenda. Go back and watch the game again instead. Make some notes about situational football. Point out the exact situations to support your argument.

Then maybe we'll listen to you. Until then, you're just another troll with an agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hulu +Live: $88.78 Amazon Prime: $16.00 (w/FanDuel: $36.12) Apple TV+: $10.66 Netflix:$26.68 Is all still $80 less per month than what I was paying for DirecTV when I gave it up a few years ago. 
    • I just don't know that he has the time to turn it around at his age. His age is going to be a major strike against him in the recruiting trail and it's just a tough row to hoe to turn a football program around. One good recruiting class can turn around a basketball team. Hell, one individual recruit can turna around a basketball team - Carmelo Anthony basically won a national championship single handedly at Syracuse. Cam at Auburn is the only college who even comes close to that type of impact off the top of my head. A good recruiting class is 2-3 years down the road from significantly impacting a college football program... if you can actually keep them around. The instant impact is in the portal but everyone else is chasing those guys too. If I was building a college program, I'd focus almost exclusively on the trenches starting out. To me, that's the big difference in college. The better teams dominate the trenches. There's just a LOT more talent disparity at the college level than there is the NFL level. The worst teams in the NFL are still full of guys who were all conference or all American at the college level. The gap between the best team in the NFL and the tenth best team in the NFL is pretty small. A couple of plays might be the difference. The #1 team in the country is probably going to be a 10 point favorite over the #10 team at the college level. The gap on talent between the #1 team and the #32 team is a massive gulf. The #1 team's backups would be competitive against the #32 team. I just don't know if Belichick after a career in the NFL was prepared for the level of talent disparity he was going to face.
    • I wouldn't drop David Moore, honestly. Moore, while long in the tooth and light in production, is about the only veteran presence in the WR room now and the only one with extensive experience with what Canales wants and needs. And that's probably why he made the roster. Still, aging safeties who might make a decent gunner just aren't where you want to spend your money and roster spots. Even at vet minimum, he's not going to be as cheap or maybe as trainable as some UDFA who would run through a brick wall for a roster spot for rookie league minimum and a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...