Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would ESPN stop kissing Matt Ryan's butt, already!!!


HGG

Recommended Posts

Thats fine, let us go right under the radar

Screw the radar.

They normally show highlights based on who's leading what.

Clearly, they have man crushes on Matt Ryan.

he didn't even have a good game today.

How can you talk about a 10-13 game for 5-10 minutes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least Ryan is something worth talking about.

I hate the falcons but he is something special. A QB like him comes along only every other blue moon.

So much so that they'd be kissing his behind even if they were 0-14, right?

Sure they would.

These PISSANTS in the media love MANUFACTURING SUPERSTARS so that they can get high off of the smell of their jockstraps.

Matt Ryan was PATHETIC today. Threw some BONEHEADED INTERCEPTIONS in the red zone.

Nothing worth ESPN getting an erection over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screw the radar.

They normally show highlights based on who's leading what.

Clearly, they have man crushes on Matt Ryan.

he didn't even have a good game today.

How can you talk about a 10-13 game for 5-10 minutes?

Lol... still... let us go under the radar. As long as we know what we're doing, you will be fine

Remember what happen before the season about the Saints??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still haven't seen one Panthers highlight on ESPN or NBC yet?

You'd think NBC would be trying to set up their game next week, but they are too busy wiping semen stains off of the stage because the Cowboys are playing tonight. Because of T.O. and Romo, not Jessica Simpson and the Cowboys Cheerleaders.

Big media markets. It's an aphrodisiac for talking heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...