Jump to content

Ace_Aladdin

All-PRO
  • Content count

    9,768
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ace_Aladdin

  1. Long as Panthers stay committed to the power running game along with CMC dump-offs, the Panthers have a good chance.
  2. So what your saying is that RBs running the ball and wearing down the defense is not same as RBs catching the ball & dinking /dunking. It doesn’t matter if they are chunk plays or not they stay committed to an actual run game that wore down Carolinas defense. It’s all about the # of attempts, they got lucky and got multiple 10 yds but even if they didn’t getting 3-4 yards on those plays would have still kept their offense on schedule. The real benefit was the ability to setup PA and open the passing game for them something a tradition run game does. CMC dump off game is not an equal substitution for a traditional running game. Running attempts: Falcons: 32  Carolina: 18
  3. Running game = Temop of the game Atlanta: 10 drives with 7 being 2 mins or more & 2 punts ( other 2 where in end of 4th qtr for running out clock) Winner Carolina: 11 drives with 5 drives under 2 mins & 4 punts. Loser
  4. Atlanta: 10 drives with 7 being 2 mins or more & 2 punts ( other 2 where in end of 4th qtr for running out clock) Carolina: 11 drives with 5 drives under 2 mins & 4 punts. In the end ATL controlled the tempo of the game with consistent drives that resulted in points! While 7mins of Panthers T.O.P. was under prevent defense. 1st qtr: ATL wins CAR: 3:24  7 plays: 3pts ATL: 5:55 10 plays: 3 pts CAR: 2:31 4 plays: punt ATL: 3:00  7 plays: punt  2nd qtr CAR wins CAR: 6:28 13 plays: 7pts ATL: 4:39  9 plays: 7pts CAR: 2:28 7 plays: punt ATL: 1:13  7 plays: 7pts CAR: 0:22 2 plays: End of 1st half 3rd qtr: ATL wins ATL: 0:44 2 plays: Interception  CAR: 1:27  4 plays: punt ATL: 3:26 7 plays: 7pts CAR: 3:50 8 plays: punt ATL: 3:49  8 plays: punt  CAR: 1:18 4th qtr ATL wins ( prevent defense) CAR: 4:03 8 plays: 7 pts ATL: 4:06 8 plays: 7pts CAR: 1:03 4 plays: interception ATL: 2:18 4 plays: punt CAR: 1:36 5 plays: 7pts ATL: 0:32 4 plays: punt CAR: 1:48   10 plays: 0 pts @KB_fan color code it?
  5. You’re not making any sense, Coleman had almost the same amount of rushing attempts as the whole Carolina’s offense. ATL running game was controlling T.O.P for 3 qtrs until they started playing prevent defense in 4th qtr. something like 65% vs 35% for Carolina. All of those chunk yards came off Play-Action thanks to a consistent run game.
  6. Running attempts: Falcons: 32 Carolina: 18 2 completely different use of the running game, the team that was consistently running won the game aka ATL. Falcons where running the ball consistently unlike the Panthers getting 6.7 YPC & wearing down the Carolina's defense as the game went on. You do know all of those chunk yards play came after a running play via Play -action or outside tackle run. The main reason for the explosive plays was due to worn out Carolina's front 7 that led to missed tackles & missed alignment....that's the effect of a running game's physicality.
  7. Mr.Fluff you haven't posted any relevant data, please answer the question below. Mr. Fluff didn't you say that 5 yards receiving is same as 5 yards rushing? P.S. Which team won, the one with RB having 100yds rushing & QB having 272 passing yards (ATL) or the one with RB having 100yds receiving & QB having 335 passing yards (CAR) P.S. Atlanta was the more physical team that got the W.
  8. A lot of fluff no data. You ever heard of the word physicality?
  9. So he will lead in receiving yards vs rushing ? Which I don't have a problem with long as they have other RBs putting work in the Power & Zone running game.
  10. Mr. Fluff didn't you say that 5 yards receiving is same as 5 yards rushing? P.S. Which team won, the one with RB having 100yds rushing & QB having 272 passing yards (ATL) or the one with RB having 100yds receiving & QB having 335 passing yards (CAR)
  11. So Panthers beat the Falcons, Saints, & Tampa when they had a RB close to 1,000 yds rushing? L
  12. The other 9 teams have RBs that produces most of the yards not QB putting up 1/3 of the production. If Panthers had actual 1,000 yds rushing without CAM (Stewart was 999yds in 2015) this team would be more dangerous and beat the Saints & Falcons like 2015.
  13. LOL I give you numbers based on 16 games and you come back with data on 2 games how selective of you, but you still get the L again. P.S. Which team won, the one with RB having 100yds rushing & QB having 272 passing yards (ATL) or the one with RB having 100yds receving & QB having 335 passing yards (CAR) YOU CAN DO BETTER!
  14. Stop lying, Falcons offense controlled majority of the game until 4th qtr when they started playing prevent and let the offense drive down. Falcons: 29:42 Panthers: 30:18
  15. Just remember 9/10 teams went to the playoff with top running game .... keep moving on Mr. Fluff & bring some real data to the argument next time. P.S. 5 yards passing doesn't have the same affect as 5 yards running on defense.
  16. Norv should have ran the ball with CJ more instead of constantly calling plays to throw to shaky hands receivers. P.S. how many deep shots did he call vs the NFL standard I would say he is way under.
  17. If Panthers stuck with the power run game and controlled the tempo of the game then Carolina's defense wouldn't have been worn out and allowed100 yds + rushing. It's a domino effect when the team goes away from running game. So when you say 5yds receiving is same as 5yds running it's doesn't have the same effect on the opposing defenses or the W/L column.
  18. We aren't talking about combined yards we are debating running game vs receiving. Top 10 Rushing teams (RB w/ 1,000yds)....guess how many had winning records and went to the playoffs 9/10 If you have balanced offense with actual running game, you are gonna win majority of the games. Please stop with fluff pieces and get some actual data.
  19. Love the fluff talk with no data to back anything up. I was arguing that CMC is more effective as a receiver than as RB. You do know that majority of the games Panthers won last year was when the team rushed for 100yds + . Do you actually beleive it was magical fairy dust that helped Saints become #1 offense or was it because they had #1 rushing attack. You see their defense is poo without Ingram power run game to control the tempo of the game.
  20. Did you see the ATL's modern offense where the RB rushed for over 100yds while Matty Ice threw for couple of hundred yards? P.S. He hasn't rushed for 100yds but he does have several games w/ 100 yds+ receiving. @Jeremy Igo Didn't Tepper say something about using analytics?
  21. I was referring to his career. Why do you think they give him more receptions than carries, is it bcause he is more effective as a receiver? That 4.8 YPC would come down if he was actually forced to run 20+ times a game like any RB. Out of 18 games he only had 6 games where he led in rushing instead of receiving.
  22. He has more yards and touchdown as a receiver, you trying using the law of averages lol
×