Jump to content
Jeremy Igo

Could Seymour win the starting job this weekend?

Recommended Posts

Let's say Worley is inactive due to injury and Seymour plays a hell of a game against the Patriots passing attack.

 

Do you then bench Worley when he is healthy again in favor Seymour?

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Yes. Worley is a liability. 


btw ur title and post are asking opposite questions. I'm responding to post.

Edited by KillerKat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

No. Worley is a liability. 


btw ur title and post are asking opposite questions. I'm responding to post.

My fault. Fixed.it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




22 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Let's say Worley is inactive due to injury and Seymour plays a hell of a game against the Patriots passing attack.

 

Do you then bench Worley when he is healthy again in favor Seymour?

Worley was always better off at SS. Never liked him at corner. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Let's say Worley is inactive due to injury and Seymour plays a hell of a game against the Patriots passing attack.

 

Do you then bench Worley when he is healthy again in favor Seymour?

Dude you just read my mind. I was checking out Seymour's profile and he appears to have a higher ceiling than Worley based on combine results, I know 40 times don't mean everything (Josh Norman) but I believe he will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hate to break it to you guys, but Bradberry had the worse game against the Saints rather than Worley.

And as far as on our defense, Seymour has a ways to go in zone coverage before he gets a big role.

Edited by Saca312
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rivera does loves his vets.. Even one year liabilities. Seymour could ball out and Worley will still start next week, unfortunately 

  • Pie 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

hate to break it to you guys, but Bradberry had the worse game against the Saints rather than Worley.

And as far as on our defense, Seymour has a ways to go in zone coverage before he gets a big role.

At least Bradberry wasn't also horrible the previous year.

Also, Seymour is perfectly suited to be a cover 3 zone corner. Basically would be a man to man corner in the scheme. 

Edited by mikeholiday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×