Parnormal Activity
#1
Posted 22 October 2009 - 01:02 PM
I saw it on Wednesday, and it was not only NOT scary, it was down right retarded. The fact that they tried to pass it off as a true story made it even worse. The chick had very nice tits though. So at least I was entertained.
#2
Posted 22 October 2009 - 03:31 PM
#3
Posted 22 October 2009 - 05:07 PM
Do other "scary" movies usually scare you? Or are you one of those "laugh at the girl who trips while running in the woods and being chased by Michael Myers who just happens to be walking" type of guys?
#4
Posted 22 October 2009 - 05:12 PM
http://www.rottentom...ormal_activity/
I will definitely be seeing it now.
#5
Posted 22 October 2009 - 05:33 PM
#6
Posted 23 October 2009 - 04:32 PM
Edited by Misty_Mountain_Hop, 23 October 2009 - 04:39 PM.
#7
Posted 23 October 2009 - 07:25 PM
#8
Posted 23 October 2009 - 09:27 PM
For people who have seen it, I am genuinly curious, as to what part creeped you out?
I think the way the movie played out, you kind of knew the guy was going to bring this thing out and piss it off, and it built all movie long. When she gets out of bed and stares at him for hours at a time, that was pretty creepy.
#9
Posted 23 October 2009 - 09:28 PM
#10
Posted 23 October 2009 - 09:33 PM
And you have to understand....this movie wasn't intended to scare people who love watching guts and eyeballs and all that schitt. It was for the regular movie-going crowd.
I think that's one of the big differences. I haven't seen the movie, but just from reading about it, it's not one of those gory bloodfests that seem to have taken over the horror genre as of late.
#11
Posted 24 October 2009 - 11:23 AM
But I would have loved to get a hold of it and make some changes, it had REAL potential to be a lot more than it was.
but it was watchable, and I was entertained.
#12
Posted 24 October 2009 - 11:26 AM
My body went numb at ONE part of the movie. You will know what part when you see it. "drag" is the key word.
But I would have loved to get a hold of it and make some changes, it had REAL potential to be a lot more than it was.
but it was watchable, and I was entertained.
Whatever company bought the film thought so too. The version in theaters is an independent film one of the big companies bought out in order to do a high-budget remake. The one out had a budget of $15,000. They started screening the movie, and apparently the response was so overwhelming they decided not to do a remake. So a $15,000 film has grossed well over $30 million in the first few weeks.
#13
Posted 31 October 2009 - 01:08 PM
I could do that crap myself...get some drums to make loud noises and fans to blow crap around and I'm an instant millionare WTF
#14
Posted 01 November 2009 - 09:58 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





