Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jase

Ron Paul wins CPAC straw poll; greeted by cascading boos

46 posts in this topic

lol

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/20/conservatives.meeting/?hpt=T1

(CNN) -- U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, a stalwart foe of government spending, won a blowout victory Saturday in the annual Conservative Political Action Conference presidential straw poll.

With participants naming "reducing the size of federal government" as their top issue, the 74-year old libertarian hero captured 31 percent of the 2,400 votes cast in the annual contest, usually seen as a barometer of how the GOP's conservative wing regards their potential presidential candidates.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney finished second with 22 percent of the vote, ending a three-year winning streak at CPAC. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin finished third with 7 percent of the vote, followed by Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty at 6 percent and Indiana Rep. Mike Pence at 5 percent.

They were followed by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who tied at 4 percent. Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, South Dakota Sen. John Thune and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour rounded out the results.

Five percent of participants voted for "Other" and 6 percent was undecided.

The announcement of Paul's win, a surprise victory unlikely to have a major impact on the 2012 presidential contest, drew a volley of loud boos from the CPAC audience.

That discontent could be seen in the poll results: A majority of participants said they wished the Republican Party had a better field of candidates to choose from.

But Paul's victory might be seen, in part, as a result of his support among anti-establishment Tea Party activists -- who turned out in force at this year's conference and expressed some frustration with the Republican Party.

Reflecting the college atmosphere of the annual event, young people dominated the voting: 54 percent of participants were between the ages of 18 and 25.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every politician is an establishment POS. Anyone that can't see that is a moron. The end.

fixed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its fortunate that Paul has zero chance of being elected.

Fortunate for supporters of big government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunate for supporters of big government.

Fortunate for those with the ability to reason. Ron Paul has some good ideas about a few things, but his isolationist stances irt NATO and the UN, his wanting to return us to the gold standard, and his belief that we were better off in the 1930's than we are now is ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honesty is what kills Paul and Nader. What you see is what you get, no bravado with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honesty is what kills Paul

unless you ask him about evolution. he'll give a different answer depending on who is listening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunate for those with the ability to reason. Ron Paul has some good ideas about a few things, but his isolationist stances irt NATO and the UN, his wanting to return us to the gold standard, and his belief that we were better off in the 1930's than we are now is ridiculous.

trying to figure out what "irt" means before i respond to this..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You do realize no one wanted RyanCare/ObamaCare Lite to pass, right? If anything, the media and democrats has made themselves absolute fools lately. STILL no evidence Trump colluded with Russia whatsoever, which is quite the funny irony in this whole conspiracy. Trump inherited a mess. Hard to fix this mess when you got crybaby globalists and dems everywhere.    
    • I hate this DG analogy so much.  It only makes sense in the context of an efficient market where teams are rational, have perfect information, and scouts are always right about players.  But we have ample evidence that is not the case.  Sometimes, talented players just don't work out.  Injuries derail careers.  Teams make oddball picks.  Sometimes, you are just wrong about a player (see Ealy, Kony). I like him a lot, but DG's habit of always trading up / never trading down may ultimately be his downfall in CAR.  It results in a lack of depth across the roster and it makes your roster very vulnerable to i) injuries (see 2015 vs. 2016) and ii) missing on evals.  If we missed on Funchess (jury still out), that hurts - but missing on Funchess when you traded multiple picks to get him compounds the issue. Trading up and trading down are both valid strategies - but I'd suggest balancing the two strategies would improve your chances of long-term success.
    • He is worth #8 pick. I'd like to see him next to Newton on the field.