No, thanks for trying
Not wrong. The ACC had just three teams in the NCAA tourney a couple of years ago. And this isn't UNC's only NIT trip recently.
Bottomline: We were at the bottom of a down ACC, one of our worst years ever and still beat your little SEC team.
Bottom line...you are bragging about beating Mississippi State. Kentucky just beat Wake Forest by 30 points.
Not really sure what your point is here. Everyone knows the SEC is the better football conference. Pretty sure I said that myself. Thanks for repeating it.
My point is basketball is all you have to hang your hat on. The SEC is the predominant football conference and with the Pac 10 has been for 40 years. Most of our schools bring in the athletes in basketball, but don't pay the coaches to keep them. In fact, we get a lot of coaches who were successful in the ACC (Cliff Ellis, Dave Odom) but can't match that success in the SEC.
No brushing up necessary. I'm fully aware of the medicority that is SEC basketball outside of UK. Please don't try to prove the historical relevance of SEC basketball compared to the ACC. You're not close, never have been, never will be and you'll be wasting your time.
UK > UNC. Duke > Florida. Outside of that, it's pretty even.