Wait, you claim that I am ignorant, but yet, I have asked you questions that you refuse to answer, but then you want me to answer your questions. Now whose the ignorant one that is scared to answer the questions? I love how you say "well lets turn this around" because you know you can not defend Luck, enough said.
Since I am not scared I will answer your fluff cake questions. In 08 Clausen carved up your Jim Harbaugh Standford team for 347 and 3tds. Also that same year he threw for 383 and 2tds against a UNC defense loaded with NFL talent. In 09 he threw for under 250yds only twice, while he picked apart that NFL loaded USC defense for 260 and 2tds, and once again spanking Jim Harbaughs defense for 340 and 5 tds. And Jimmy won his bowl game, cant say the same for Luck.
You want to claim that "ahhh these experts has Luck at #1 and were taking him" well hey genius, those same EXPERTS also had Jimmy as a top 10 pick last year, so what is your point?
And you obviously do not know football if you think a rookie QB can put a team on his back and carry them to victory, especially when your team is as atrocious as ours. How can you possibly believe that?
You say I'm ignorant but say "Luck would have probably done better then Jimmy this year" and you have absolutely nothing to back that up, IGNORANT.
Also Peyton Mannings rookie year he went 3-13, so should the colts have drafted Daunte Culpepper the following year with the 4th pick? Answer the question! Based off of your logic, what would be your answer. It's basically the same situation as Jimmy so lets see if all of a sudden you change your mind.
Now since I've answered your questions and smashed them, I expect you to answer all of the ones you have been to scared to answer, plus the one I just asked.
Only one "so-called expert" had Clausen as a top 10 pick The rest had bailed on him as a prospect much, much earlier.