CBA Talks
#1
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:30 PM
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=6105114
#2
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:33 PM
I'll say this though... if we don't have a lockout, Richardson is going to look like a dolt.
#3
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:37 PM
all depends on what we do with all the extra cap space we have.Yeah, I'm starting to have a little hope now. I'm not sure why they waited until 20-something days to get serious about this, but whatever...
I'll say this though... if we don't have a lockout, Richardson is going to look like a dolt.
#4
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:38 PM
#5
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:38 PM
Yeah, I'm starting to have a little hope now. I'm not sure why they waited until 20-something days to get serious about this, but whatever...
I'll say this though... if we don't have a lockout, Richardson is going to look like a dolt.
Richardson is in a win/win situation. Dumped alot of salary this past season the books are cleared coming in 2011. So if there is a season we re-sign our key players and have some extra cash for free agency.
The season just ended the NFL was going to overshadow the SuperBowl with CBA talks. This is the right time to get them started. This is really the first round of talks to hammer a deal out. That is why I dont expect them to have a deal. As long as they get one done before March I will be happy.
#6
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:38 PM
Yeah, I'm starting to have a little hope now. I'm not sure why they waited until 20-something days to get serious about this, but whatever...
I'll say this though... if we don't have a lockout, Richardson is going to look like a dolt.
Why? he used the uncapped year to get rid of bad contracts.
#7
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:41 PM
#8
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:45 PM
Why? he used the uncapped year to get rid of bad contracts.
No no no... nothing about salary moves... we won't know how that all pans out for another year or two.
My comment was reflecting on his statements about the CBA during his Presser recently. He cast a very long shadow over it getting worked out, and seemed like he was saying a lockout was a foregone conclusion. If a new CBA gets done, well, I guess he was wrong to say the least.
#9
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:46 PM
No no no... nothing about salary moves... we won't know how that all pans out for another year or two.
My comment was reflecting on his statements about the CBA during his Presser recently. He cast a very long shadow over it getting worked out, and seemed like he was saying a lockout was a foregone conclusion. If a new CBA gets done, well, I guess he was wrong to say the least.
That's called playing hardball...
#10
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:50 PM
Richardson is in a win/win situation. Dumped alot of salary this past season the books are cleared coming in 2011. So if there is a season we re-sign our key players and have some extra cash for free agency.
The season just ended the NFL was going to overshadow the SuperBowl with CBA talks. This is the right time to get them started. This is really the first round of talks to hammer a deal out. That is why I dont expect them to have a deal. As long as they get one done before March I will be happy.
So what you're saying is that if everything works out JR will look like a genius
:leaving:
#11
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:51 PM
That's called playing hardball...
Hmm. Perhaps. But usually the tone is a leeeetle more optimistic towards the media about negotiations, if there really is a hope. I don't know that a press conference is the best place to try and stare down your opponent's hand.
#12
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:52 PM
Hmm. Perhaps. But usually the tone is a leeeetle more optimistic towards the media about negotiations, if there really is a hope. I don't know that a press conference is the best place to try and stare down your opponent's hand.
Anytime the issue comes up, he has to stare it down.
#13
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:52 PM
I'm not sure why they waited until 20-something days to get serious about this, but whatever...
it's part of the bargaining process (any bargaining process). both sides want to be perceived as not willing to budge. both sides want to wait for the other to slip up in some way (see D. Smith saying the players got a great deal last time). both sides don't want to be the one that admits that they are afraid of losing their source of income.
it's bargaining. leverage and pressure are the best weapons. the merits of the two arguments mean very little in comparison.
#14
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:55 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





