Jump to content

- - - - -

3 questions for the huddle.

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
42 replies to this topic

#1 Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Leeroy Jenkins PhD


  • Joined: 24-January 10
  • posts: 2,079
  • Reputation: 1,035

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:31 AM

Good morning huddle nation, me and some friends were sitting around last night drinking and discussing the Panthers and we came up with a couple interesting questions that I would like to hear your response to:

1. Would you be willing to trade steve smith if it meant we could bring in a great veteran QB? IE Mcnabb or Kolb

2. Would you be willing to let D-will walk if it meant we could bring in a top CB FA prospect? IE Nnamdi Asomugha

3. Would you be willing to let CJ walk if it meant we could bring in a top DT prospect? IE Brandon Mebane or Barry Cofield

Basically could you stand watching one of the big three go if it meant we could address other areas of concern. Lets be honest, RB and DE are pretty solid positions for us. WR...... well, they are coming around. But DT, CB and possibly a veteran QB all seem to be very pressing needs.

What could you stomach?

#2 SorthNarolina


    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,408
  • Reputation: 3

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:33 AM




#3 Cyberjag


    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,830
  • Reputation: 638

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:35 AM

2 maybe. Smitty is worth more than a stopgap QB, and CJ will help the team a lot more than any FA DT out there.

#4 jtnc


    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,638
  • Reputation: 3,571

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:37 AM






    Official Panthers Fan

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,480
  • Reputation: 1,746

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:39 AM

1 no
2 maybe- depends on the corner if is Aso then yes, anyone else and I would be hesitant
3 no

bascially I wouldn't do it unless I knew the player we were getting was better at his respective position

#6 Stroupe-a-loop


    Señor Member

  • Joined: 06-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,672
  • Reputation: 393

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:40 AM

No, I don't think McNabb for Smith helps us, and I think Kolb would just split the fanbase when either he or Cam struggles.

Yes, I love Deangelo, but I think a top tier CB, like Jonathan Joseph, is probably more valuable to the franchise than a top tier runningback. It's just a better long term investment.

No, I don't think there is a veteran DT available in this FA pool in Johnson's class. Because of the positional importance, the DT would have to be significantly more talented for me to take him over the end.

#7 Lumps


    Jase is butthurt

  • Joined: 20-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,783
  • Reputation: 908

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:40 AM

no smitty is better with what we have, MM can suffice for a vet if we can keep SS

yes, but only for a player of aso's level but that is kind of a silly questions their stocks are different.

no CJ>>>>>Coefield, and CJ represents the 'core' to me as much as anyone. We drafted him, watched him progress and now for what? JR needs to follow through, drafting CJ represents exactly the kind of team JR so proudly talks about building, through the draft so it would look foolish of JR to trade or have him leave for whatever reason. JR could have been willing to spend money in 2010 and win more so we wouldn't have to worry about the core leaving because 'they want to win'.

#8 KSpan



  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 3,487
  • Reputation: 1,771

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:42 AM

No - I'm content with watching Newton/Moore/a possily improved Clausen fling it around this year.

Maybe - depends on the player. Nnamdi, yes. Braylon Edwards, no.

No - that would weaken the line, and Carolina is likely going to aggressively pursue a DT like Cofield anyway.

#9 dpanther69


    Senior Member

  • Joined: 02-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,000
  • Reputation: 250

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:49 AM

I would say no to all three I feel we have a coaching staff that is willing to develop the talent we have unlike the last group who were lame duck coaches who either bailed early or knew there would be a job opening awaiting them. We have lost enough talent already. I don't feel like robing Peter to pay Paul is the answer.

#10 jasonluckydog


    Honorary Honeydick Member

  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • posts: 13,592
  • Reputation: 3,370

Posted 26 June 2011 - 08:55 AM