Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

And down goes Herman


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

#1 Jangler

Jangler

    Its gonna be just like they say, them voices tell me so

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 47,168 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 02:42 AM

where is NA to gloat about it? :)

vid in the link.

http://www.examiner....f-mosques-video

Today on Fox News Sunday Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain said local communities should be allowed ban Islamic mosques. In an interview (seen to the left), host Chris Wallace asks whether “any community” could ban a mosque. Cain responds by saying that Islam is supposedly different from the other religions, and therefore it would be allowable for a local community to simply ban the mosque. Wallace, somewhat in disbelief at that answer, again asks Cain if any community could ban a mosque. Cain responds, “Yes. They have a right to do that. That’s not discriminating based on religion.”



#2 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,107 posts
  • LocationMorehead City

Posted 19 July 2011 - 03:22 AM

Wallace, somewhat in disbelief at that answer, again asks Cain if any community could ban a mosque. Cain responds, “Yes. They have a right to do that. That’s not discriminating based on religion.”


:frown2:

#3 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,347 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 05:02 AM

He might be crazy but his lack of political correctness is refreshing.

#4 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 05:04 AM

he might be crazy but his pure, unadulterated bigotry and general lack of understanding of the US constitution is refreshing

#5 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,347 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 05:53 AM

he might be crazy but his pure, unadulterated bigotry and general lack of understanding of the US constitution is refreshing


Please enlighten me on his lack of understanding of the constitution. He reads it like it was meant to be read, not like how lobs have expanded the reach of the fed guvment.

#6 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,538 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 06:09 AM

If we want to turn fire hoses on Negros to keep them away from our lunch counters or prevent ragheads from congregatin' to worship their terrorist god, it ain't nobody else's business.

/States Rights argument

#7 Jangler

Jangler

    Its gonna be just like they say, them voices tell me so

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 47,168 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 06:22 AM

yeah, we need to get rid of those borders too.

#8 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,983 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 06:26 AM

How come negroes is capitalized and ragheads isn't?

#9 SgtJoo

SgtJoo

    Reppin that Bull City

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,464 posts
  • LocationDurham, NC

Posted 19 July 2011 - 06:27 AM

How come negroes is capitalized and ragheads isn't?


Well if that ain't pedantic...

#10 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,089 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 06:42 AM

This is just another day in Republicanland. But at least it's refreshing in a Jim Crow, "ain't it great someone says what they really feel about people that are different from me!" way.

#11 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,107 posts
  • LocationMorehead City

Posted 19 July 2011 - 09:03 AM

Please enlighten me on his lack of understanding of the constitution. He reads it like it was meant to be read, not like how lobs have expanded the reach of the fed guvment.


How is restricting the practice of religion not violating the constitution?

#12 wattchano

wattchano

    ^^^ That's my man!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 09:29 AM

:puke::puke:

#13 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,347 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 09:56 AM

How is restricting the practice of religion not violating the constitution?


what section of the US constitution does it supposedly violate?

#14 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,089 posts

Posted 19 July 2011 - 10:18 AM

there you go folks, it's just this easy.

#15 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,858 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 19 July 2011 - 10:20 AM

thought this was going to be about another republican bathroom stall incident.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com