No, my problem isn't that I disagree with his opinion (though I do). My problem is he says something that ignorant without any real basis. Don't say a guy lacks work ethic or the ability to succeed without some logical reasoning behind it. Saying "he had too much success at the college level to be good" is fuging retarded. Let's think about other collegiate players who had a lot of success that worked out pretty good (thus far) into their careers:
Those are just off the top of my head. Probably many more, retired and current players. So, his statement is fallacious and ignorant, that is my problem (and I think most people's problem) with it. What, are we not allowed to bash somebody's opinion when they have zero basis for it?
His basis could be this (Please don't read this as my opinion of Cam):
Went to Florida...instead of studying, decided to take the easy way and cheat to pass indicating a lack of work ethic.
Went to Florida...was 3rd on the depth chart coupled with his possible expulsion and he took the easy way out instead of battling to work his way up the depth chart and left school. Meh.
Went to Blinn...played JUCO football and won a NC. Considering the great athletic talent that Cam is, it CAN BE ARGUED that he relied on his natural gifts to win and didn't NEED to put in the work based on the inferior opponents.
Auburn...decide for yourself. If you focus on him as a playmaker, you probably liked him. If you focus on him as an NFL QB, you might think he lacks work ethic.
He didn't take those raw tools at Auburn and fine tune them, they are still raw, which could show a lack of work ethic.
You could also see it that he perfected the game plan he was given and that shows that he spent time studying film and the game plan, which could show a great work ethic.
There are things about him that signal a lack of work ethic.
There are things about him that signal a very strong work ethic.
It's all in the eye of the beholder but to say his opinion is ignorant only shows your inability to view the argument from the other side of the table and really shows how narrow minded you are.
Whether right or wrong, agree or disagree, the ability to understand your opponents argument is vital and you've demonstrated a deficiency here.
I have a stance on Cam (which many of you misunderstand) but I 100% acknowledge there is another stance on him which can be built on as strong a foundation as my own.