Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Democrats...*sigh*


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
28 replies to this topic

#13 dimbee

dimbee

    Rabble Rouser

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,915
  • Reputation: 76
HUDDLER

Posted 03 March 2009 - 10:04 PM

1. Just wait until Obama gets us deep into Afghanistan.
2. What is 1.9 trillion minus 450 billion?


Just imagine if Dumbya had a few more months...

#14 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,983
  • Reputation: 1
HUDDLER

Posted 03 March 2009 - 10:12 PM

Just imagine if Dumbya had a few more months...


Dumbya phoned it in the last year as it was.

#15 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 18,356
  • Reputation: 6,782
Administrators

Posted 03 March 2009 - 10:12 PM

Once we get most in the tinderbox to admit that Obama and Bush are basically the same person, we'll be finally getting somewhere...

#16 shinner

shinner

    Anomaly

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,781
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 03 March 2009 - 10:35 PM

I'm no Bush fan. Every time he got in front of a podium I cringed because he butchered the language. But I knew that this guy was the wrong way to turn. And the people who actually make this country work aren't going to sit by while he takes from them to subsidize those who refuse to work.

EZ there Mr. Meat...I'm not a fan of either Bush or Obama so don't come at me like I'm some Obamanaut on another anti-Bush rant. I just think it's a joke for either side to blame the other. They're equally responsible.

#17 Hawkfanadam

Hawkfanadam

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-March 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 326
  • Reputation: 97
HUDDLER

Posted 04 March 2009 - 12:33 AM

Once we get most in the tinderbox to admit that Obama and Bush are basically the same person, we'll be finally getting somewhere...


How are they the same person?? Obama basically reversed every policy Bush had set in.. I just don't see how you can make that point.

#18 venom

venom

    oneinfiniteconsciousness

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,931
  • Reputation: 536
HUDDLER

Posted 04 March 2009 - 03:25 AM

Americans killed in wars started by Bush = 4000 +


if i remember correctly, they hit us first.

stop trying to defend obama. you cant. the guy is royaly fuging up this country and you know it.

#19 venom

venom

    oneinfiniteconsciousness

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,931
  • Reputation: 536
HUDDLER

Posted 04 March 2009 - 03:32 AM

Bush takes over budget surplus and great economy
Obama takes over huge deficit and terrible economy


the economy was excellent during bush's first 6 years. however, back in 2006 when the dems took control of the government, it all started going downhill, largely in part to democrat senators dropping the ball on the whole freddie mac/fannie mae scandal. yea bush's spending was out of control, but it doesn't help when you've tripled the national debt in less than 6 weeks.

on a side note, bush had generated 20% more revenue during his tenure than bill clinton.

#20 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,961
MFCEO

Posted 04 March 2009 - 05:46 AM

nevermind that republicans are getting more earmark money per senator than the dems.


lol

#21 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,865
  • Reputation: 4,621
Administrators

Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:43 AM

nevermind that republicans are getting more earmark money per senator than the dems.


lol


Would that have anything to do with there being more Dems than Reps ?:mad2:

#22 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,961
MFCEO

Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:49 AM

Would that have anything to do with there being more Dems than Reps ?:mad2:


Uh, no.

Wouldn't you think the party that is kicking and screaming over earmarks would have much less of a piece of the pie adjusted for senate membership?

Turns out they are more on the take than the dems.


Everyone sucks.


lol

#23 Murph

Murph

    Joe Cool

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,972
  • Reputation: 323
HUDDLER

Posted 04 March 2009 - 09:06 AM

If the Pubs were to get more of the earmarks, then wouldn't that give the Dems even more justification to vote against it especially taking into consideration the promisies made by their president?

If the Pubs were to get more of the earmarks, then why did over 2/3 of them vote against it but only 2 Dems?

#24 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,961
MFCEO

Posted 04 March 2009 - 09:22 AM

If the Pubs were to get more of the earmarks, then why did over 2/3 of them vote against it but only 2 Dems?



Because they know the dems will pass it. This way they can have their cake and eat it too. 1. Get money from taxpayers to help their states 2. Look conservative for voting against the money they are taking.

And people are buying all this BS?


sad