Schilling retires..
Started by shinner, Mar 23 2009 12:11 PM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 23 March 2009 - 12:11 PM
Just announced....no big surprise, probably should have happened last year.
#2
Posted 23 March 2009 - 12:15 PM
Expected. I think he had no interest from other teams. The Sox might have come calling in the season if they had 2-3 starters banged up that that's about the only way they would.
#3
Posted 23 March 2009 - 02:46 PM
I think Cubs were exploring the possibilities but I think his body has just given out.
#4
Posted 24 March 2009 - 07:41 AM
So is he a Hall of Famer?
#5
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:31 AM
So is he a Hall of Famer?
I think so. 200+ wins and a 3.46 ERA is not exactly the BEST line. (I think 350+ wins is a lock) But judging by all the history (bloody sock, cornerstone to comeback win, dynasty) I think he will be able to make it in. We all know Selig, and how big he is with image. Well, Schilling's image is one of the best out there, pitching in times with Bonds, Sosa, Clemens, Etc.. He is one of the TRUE great pitchers. So I believe it is... Schilling + Stats = No Hall... BUT.. Schilling + Stats + Variables = Hall. I think it would be great to see him in
#6
Posted 24 March 2009 - 11:36 AM
Hall of Famer for sure!
Also the missing piece in the Sox puzzle of breaking the curse!
Thanks Curt for everything!!!!
Also the missing piece in the Sox puzzle of breaking the curse!
Thanks Curt for everything!!!!
#7
Posted 24 March 2009 - 02:06 PM
avg about 10 wins/season
it isn't the hall of really good, or the really good in the postseason, it is the hall of fame
fwiw i don't think santo should be in.
it isn't the hall of really good, or the really good in the postseason, it is the hall of fame
fwiw i don't think santo should be in.
#8
Posted 24 March 2009 - 03:30 PM
I'm iffy on the Hall thing. I would say no stats wise, but you are right he broke the curse with the Red Sox and then the sock thing and all of that. Also him coming out hard on the steroid users and all that. He may be one of the few pitchers that wasn't using the roids during the 90's.
#9
Posted 24 March 2009 - 04:15 PM
maybe
I find it odd that his numbers got better after age 30.
Sad, but I question all oddities now.
I find it odd that his numbers got better after age 30.
Sad, but I question all oddities now.
#11
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:17 PM
No.
Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Johnson, Hoffman, Rivera, and probably Pedro are the only ones retiring now or soon that I think are HOFers.
Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Johnson, Hoffman, Rivera, and probably Pedro are the only ones retiring now or soon that I think are HOFers.
#12
Posted 29 March 2009 - 10:21 PM
He's going to begin focusing on campaigning for Sarah Palin in 2012
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






