Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Does gun control really work?


  • Please log in to reply
92 replies to this topic

#16 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,968 posts
  • LocationOn a Sales Call

Posted 17 April 2009 - 08:02 AM

i'm personally opposed to guns. they increase the danger to every household they are in. people with guns in their home are more likely to be killed by guns, and more likely to commit suicide.


I really dislike this statement. It's liberal B.S.

i think they should be treated much in the way that cars are. people should take tests on proper use and safety. they are at least as much of a responsibility as driving.


I really love this statement by rodeo. It's liberal brilliance. This is actually what the NRA promotes rodeo.

Edited by SouthCakPanther, 17 April 2009 - 08:04 AM.


#17 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,551 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 08:55 AM

I really love this statement by rodeo. It's liberal brilliance. This is actually what the NRA promotes rodeo.


If the NRA really supports that, why are they against background checks at gun shows?

#18 Fireball77

Fireball77

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,398 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 08:56 AM

i think they should be treated much in the way that cars are. people should take tests on proper use and safety. they are at least as much of a responsibility as driving.

I agree with that. Sadly though, misuse of cars (a/k/a drunk or otherwise negligent driving) kills more people than people with legally obtained firearms do, but doesn't incur a quarter of the outcry.

We are gun owners who are safety conscious and the other gun owners I know personally are rabid about safety as well. Still, it is something that should be mandatory, the safety tests. Heck, don't lifeguards have to take tests on water safety before they are lifeguards?

#19 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,968 posts
  • LocationOn a Sales Call

Posted 17 April 2009 - 08:57 AM

If the NRA really supports that, why are they against background checks at gun shows?


$$$$$$$ I suppose.

I guess I should say, the NRA supports training and safe ownership in their Literature.

#20 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,551 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:09 AM

$$$$$$$ I suppose.

I guess I should say, the NRA supports training and safe ownership in their Literature.


Ooooooo wow! You know they're serious when they have pamphlets in their office.

The problem is that due to well organized gun fanatics, it's near impossible to pass sensible gun laws.

Somehow allowing a person with a history of mental illness immediate access to semi automatic guns with enough ammo to invade Poland is the only way certain people feel we can defend our freedom.

#21 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,886 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:12 AM

http://en.wikipedia....tomatic_firearm

#22 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,000 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:26 AM

http://en.wikipedia....tomatic_firearm


:confused5:

#23 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,968 posts
  • LocationOn a Sales Call

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:31 AM

Ooooooo wow! You know they're serious when they have pamphlets in their office.

The problem is that due to well organized gun fanatics, it's near impossible to pass sensible gun laws.

Somehow allowing a person with a history of mental illness immediate access to semi automatic guns with enough ammo to invade Poland is the only way certain people feel we can defend our freedom.


Never discount the power of the pamphlet........

#24 engine9

engine9

    shoota muhfukkaina minute

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,089 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:37 AM

:confused5:


"semi-automatic" groups nearly all hunting weapons as well. An "automatic" shotgun, most hunting rifles, my little Nylon .22 squirrel gun.

#25 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 23,788 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:38 AM

Never discount the power of the pamphlet........


It's a pamphlet not a menu...you know we aint reading that

#26 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,968 posts
  • LocationOn a Sales Call

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:41 AM

It's a pamphlet not a menu...you know we aint reading that


Word. You're right, F*ck a pamphlet.

#27 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,886 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:43 AM

Word. You're right, F*ck a pamphlet.


Been there.

Beware papercuts.

#28 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,551 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:47 AM

http://en.wikipedia....tomatic_firearm


Yeah, I saw that linked in this article:

http://en.wikipedia....a_Tech_massacre

#29 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,968 posts
  • LocationOn a Sales Call

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:47 AM

High gloss recycled paper = fun without the knicks and cuts of a pamphlet.

#30 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 23,788 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:48 AM

I think we should make all guns illegal except for muzzle loaders.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com