Luke Kuechly Visiting Carolina
Started by DynastyRTR, Mar 19 2012 10:33 PM
149 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:33 PM
#3
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:37 PM
Definitely wouldn't be mad at this pick if Mo doesn't fall to 9. Probably the most sure pick on defense at that point.
Just wish there was a clear cut dominate tackle available at 9. Poe & Brockers are both a crapshoot, but Cox probably won't be available in the 2nd.
Would like to trade down a few spots to get him, but the general consensus is that he won't be there past 15, maybe even past 12.
Just wish there was a clear cut dominate tackle available at 9. Poe & Brockers are both a crapshoot, but Cox probably won't be available in the 2nd.
Would like to trade down a few spots to get him, but the general consensus is that he won't be there past 15, maybe even past 12.
#4
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:37 PM
Good.
#5
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:38 PM
Oh this will get the Kuechly fan boys riled up again.
#6
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:43 PM
I cud see us drafting him at our pick.
#7
Guest_Bwood_*
#9
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:02 AM
I wonder if signing Garay and drafting Luke would be better than getting a DT. Lord knows whichever DT we draft won't be ready any time soon. There's no Kris Jenkins in this draft.
Of course, I'm always hoping for Claiborne.
Of course, I'm always hoping for Claiborne.
#10
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:11 AM
Claiborne........must drop.
#11
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:35 AM
I'm not going to lie, I would be a fan of this happening. If and only if Claiborne does not fall and we don't trade down.
#12
Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:53 AM
Bring in the white boy.
#13
Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:57 AM
i'd take it.
#14
Posted 20 March 2012 - 03:20 AM
I must be one of the only people who think this guy can play strongside 'backer...
#15
Posted 20 March 2012 - 03:49 AM
Edit: Forget it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






