Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Hypothetical Trade


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
32 replies to this topic

Poll: Hypothetical Trade (66 member(s) have cast votes)

How willing would you pursue a trade like this?

  1. Very Willing (26 votes [39.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.39%

  2. Somewhat Willing (15 votes [22.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.73%

  3. Unsure (6 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  4. Not too willing (11 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  5. Not willing at all (8 votes [12.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.12%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,774
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:46 AM

Would you guys trade down out of our 9th pick and pick up 2 first rounders and a 3rd but lose our 2nd rounder?

Not saying this is going to happen, just wanted to get your philosophy on this trade.

#2 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • Joined: 14-March 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,387
  • Reputation: 177
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:50 AM

Is it a first this year?

#3 FutureDynasty

FutureDynasty

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 08-March 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 353
  • Reputation: 200
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:51 AM

can we get a worthless thread option??? because that's what i would choose. B)

#4 SOJA

SOJA

    Official Panthers Fan

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,646
  • Reputation: 1,849
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:51 AM

if we could score Fletcher Cox and Janoris Jenkins yes.

#5 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,774
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:51 AM

Yeah we'd trade our 9 and our 2nd for 2 lower firsts and a 3rd.

#6 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • Joined: 14-March 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,387
  • Reputation: 177
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:55 AM

Yeah we'd trade our 9 and our 2nd for 2 lower firsts and a 3rd.


So 9 and 40 for 27, 31, and 93? I would

#7 Wyank

Wyank

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 14-December 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,013
  • Reputation: 604
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:56 AM

I voted somewhat willing depending on who is available at the time of number 9 pick. If it's Claiborne, I'm not sure I'm doing the trade instead of picking him.

#8 Doyle

Doyle

    Headed to the county line

  • Joined: 18-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,232
  • Reputation: 1,918
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:00 AM

Someone else brought this up and I think it is a good trade senario. I'd say yes. The Bengals are in a position to do this at 17 and 21.

#9 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,288
  • Reputation: 6,386
Moderators

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:03 AM

Would you guys trade down out of our 9th pick and pick up 2 first rounders and a 3rd but lose our 2nd rounder?

Not saying this is going to happen, just wanted to get your philosophy on this trade.


Even trade Our 1st for 2 1sts this year.

Leave the other picks out of it. You are basically giving a 2nd for a 3rd. It does nothing.

#10 CarolinaNCSU

CarolinaNCSU

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 12-September 11
  • posts: 5,959
  • Reputation: 2,786
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:03 AM

If it's the Bengals, no question. If it's the Patriots, maybe probably.

#11 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,432
  • Reputation: 114
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:04 AM

I depends on the draft position.. you can't answer this question without having more information.

#12 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,774
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:04 AM

Even trade Our 1st for 2 1sts this year.

Leave the other picks out of it. You are basically giving a 2nd for a 3rd. It does nothing.


Sure it does consider we have a high 2nd and we'd be getting a mid to low 3rd rounder.

#13 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,774
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:06 AM

I depends on the draft position.. you can't answer this question without having more information.


Clearly, but use your best judgement based on what players are going to be there. I think many would pass on this if Claiborne was there. But I think in any other situation I'd trade down, that's just me though.

#14 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,288
  • Reputation: 6,386
Moderators

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:06 AM

So we are getting a low 3rd for a high second. I would run from this.

#15 Panther53521

Panther53521

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 824
  • Reputation: 346
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:07 AM

I would prefer to keep our 2nd round pick. Anyone moving up to 9th needs to play a big price. 2 first and a third sounds good to me.

Atlanta gave up 2 1st a 3rd and 2 4ths for the 6th pick