Let me get this straight, we'd lose our first for 2 seconds? If so, hell no.
No, I'm not that stupid.
our 1st (9) and our 2nd
2 lower firsts (e.g. 17 & 21) and a third.
The reason I pose this question is because I feel like there's a lot more value in 2 mid/lower first rounders vs who is going to be available at 9. But if you feel like losing a 2nd is too much just to pick up two first rounders than I would understand. This poll isn't meant to see if you think it's fair or not, because this is most certainly a realistic trade. It's more to judge the value of the trade and how comfortable you'd be selecting at these spots considering where players should fall.