Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Hypothetical Trade


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
32 replies to this topic

Poll: Hypothetical Trade (66 member(s) have cast votes)

How willing would you pursue a trade like this?

  1. Very Willing (26 votes [39.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.39%

  2. Somewhat Willing (15 votes [22.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.73%

  3. Unsure (6 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  4. Not too willing (11 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  5. Not willing at all (8 votes [12.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.12%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#31 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,430
  • Reputation: 113
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:03 AM

Clearly, but use your best judgement based on what players are going to be there. I think many would pass on this if Claiborne was there. But I think in any other situation I'd trade down, that's just me though.


If we are getting the Patriots #27 and #31, then No, I would pass on the trade.
If we are getting the Browns two 1st's then I would be all over it.
It completely depends on the picks we trade for..

#32 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,053
  • Reputation: 2,758
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:15 PM

No, I'm not that stupid.

We'd lose our 1st (9) and our 2nd
and
We'd gain 2 lower firsts (e.g. 17 & 21) and a third.

The reason I pose this question is because I feel like there's a lot more value in 2 mid/lower first rounders vs who is going to be available at 9. But if you feel like losing a 2nd is too much just to pick up two first rounders than I would understand. This poll isn't meant to see if you think it's fair or not, because this is most certainly a realistic trade. It's more to judge the value of the trade and how comfortable you'd be selecting at these spots considering where players should fall.





Thanks for the clarification.

#33 Frizzy350

Frizzy350

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,419
  • Reputation: 596
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:41 PM

I wouldn't do this because our high second rounder is almost as good as a first. there is going to be very little drop off in talent between say picks 25-40.

only way i would do this is if we got this deal from the bengals for #17 and #21. could pick jenkins/kirkpatrick and one of high ceiling DTs.