Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 2 votes

Coming Down To Coples Or Kuechly


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
150 replies to this topic

#31 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,421
  • Reputation: 2,152
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:44 PM

I doubt the Panthers know who they want to take at this point. They are doing their due diligence and bringing in guys in the event of all kind of possibilities. When you pick at the 9th spot you have to be fluid and go with the flow. You don't know who will be gone and who will be there when you pick. You have to be willing to change as well. We might have some one we like at 9 and then we get an offer from someone else to move down for example. That changes everything. Maybe someone wants Stewart and wants to trade some picks for him, who knows.

But the whole idea that it has come down to two guys at this point is frankly naive at best.

#32 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,597
  • Reputation: 1,635
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:44 PM

CB is our biggest need at present. If Davis and Beason are not back to form than LB would be our biggest need imo.

I wouldnt say Hardy is a beast though.

Coples would simply be BPA at around 9, not to mention he is DL.


anyone that truly paid attention to Hardy realizes the potency he brings to the pass rush.. dude was everywhere on the field... Right now, I'll take Hardy over Coples 9 times out of 10 and that 1 shot is hoping Coples has half the motor Hardy brings to the table..

#33 Frizzy350

Frizzy350

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,411
  • Reputation: 593
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:45 PM

You must have some sick inside knowledge.

Havent seen any mock with us or anyone taking a CB not named Claiborne in the top 10.....

kudos


Thats a joke. You think our FO gives a poo what a mock draft says? If our coaches look at someone's game tape, meet with them and their coaches and everything checks out as being a perfect fit for us then I'm pretty sure we will take them, despite whether they are projected to go a handful of picks late or not.

#34 Frizzy350

Frizzy350

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,411
  • Reputation: 593
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:47 PM

There is risk.

I think he has the potential to be elite. And is a clear upgrade over Hardy.

Coples biggest problem is effort imo.


You watch our games don't you? Then you know that in passing situations between Hardy and CJ the two consistently get pressure around the edges. Problem is the QB has all the space in the world to step up.

#35 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:49 PM

Thats a joke. You think our FO gives a poo what a mock draft says? If our coaches look at someone's game tape, meet with them and their coaches and everything checks out as being a perfect fit for us then I'm pretty sure we will take them, despite whether they are projected to go a handful of picks late or not.


we aint drafting a CB not named Claiborne with the 9th pick. You can take that to the bank.

#36 Carolina Husker

Carolina Husker

    I hate football

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,530
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:49 PM

You must have some sick inside knowledge.


Says the soothsayer who started the thread about knowing who our picks will be.

#37 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:50 PM

Says the soothsayer who started the thread about knowing who our picks will be.


guess you missed the "imo" part.

smh

#38 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,851
  • Reputation: 5,761
Moderators

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:51 PM

I doubt the Panthers know who they want to take at this point. They are doing their due diligence and bringing in guys in the event of all kind of possibilities. When you pick at the 9th spot you have to be fluid and go with the flow. You don't know who will be gone and who will be there when you pick. You have to be willing to change as well. We might have some one we like at 9 and then we get an offer from someone else to move down for example. That changes everything. Maybe someone wants Stewart and wants to trade some picks for him, who knows.

But the whole idea that it has come down to two guys at this point is frankly naive at best.

Which is why I will be fine with Luke Kuechly if we draft him. I just like arguing my opinion.

#39 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,851
  • Reputation: 5,761
Moderators

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:52 PM

guess you missed the "imo" part.

smh

well then

imo you are a brilliant poster

#40 davos

davos

    €∞€∞€∞€

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,494
  • Reputation: 1,930
HUDDLER

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:53 PM

we aint drafting a CB not named Claiborne with the 9th pick. You can take that to the bank.


It would be incredibly stupid to narrow it down to only 2 picks at this point. We don't know what will happen in front of us.

Its down to a lot of guys. We're at pick f'n 9, not 3 or 4.

It could be Kuechly, Cox, Claiborne, Coples, Floyd, Ingram, hell even DeCastro for all we know

Don't try to convince yourself its one or the other