Jump to content





Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Chris Cooley?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
68 replies to this topic

#46 KillerKat

KillerKat

    GTFO Shula

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,589
  • Reputation: 4,737
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:37 AM

I'd like the addition.

Btw, Cooley has never had an all-pro selection: http://www.pro-footb.../C/CoolCh00.htm

#47 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,925
  • Reputation: 2,320
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:45 AM

I'd like the addition.

Btw, Cooley has never had an all-pro selection: http://www.pro-footb.../C/CoolCh00.htm


hmmm....contradicting info......

nevermind

#48 pOpCoRnPoPpEr

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,940
  • Reputation: 15
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:48 AM

I'd like the addition.

Btw, Cooley has never had an all-pro selection: http://www.pro-footb.../C/CoolCh00.htm


Weird, i'm sure i read somewhere he was. Maybe it was wiki idk.

#49 KillerKat

KillerKat

    GTFO Shula

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,589
  • Reputation: 4,737
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:54 AM

He was All Pro 2005 and Pro Bowl 2007 and 2008


No he wasnt, it's in the link. And this one, which is vacant on the 2nd team: http://sports.espn.g...=nfl&id=2285778

He was All-Conference though.

#50 KillerKat

KillerKat

    GTFO Shula

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,589
  • Reputation: 4,737
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:54 AM

Weird, i'm sure i read somewhere he was. Maybe it was wiki idk.


wiki has all-pro selections all f**ked up. Can't trust them on that.

#51 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,925
  • Reputation: 2,320
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:59 AM

wiki has all-pro selections all f**ked up. Can't trust them on that.


Well, this from your source says he was.

http://www.pro-footb...2005/allpro.htm

#52 KillerKat

KillerKat

    GTFO Shula

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,589
  • Reputation: 4,737
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:00 AM

Well, this from your source says he was.

http://www.pro-footb...2005/allpro.htm


Look to the right of it. It tells you right there what the award was "Pro Football Weekly: 1st Team All-Conf."

#53 pOpCoRnPoPpEr

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,940
  • Reputation: 15
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:00 AM

Stats?Sure...probowls don't mean anything.


Ok stats.

Winslow has more RECs (9 more actually) and YARDs 4830 to Cooleys 4703.

Cooley on the other hand has ten more touchdowns 33 to 23 and a better Yards After Catch.

Both avg 11 yards per catch.

Not to mention Cooley is a much better blocker and is more versatile. + he's just an over all better person.

#54 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • Joined: 22-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,863
  • Reputation: 802
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:06 AM

I agree he's a better person.

#55 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,925
  • Reputation: 2,320
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:06 AM

Well, this from your source says he was.

http://www.pro-footb...2005/allpro.htm


nevermind again, I'm an idiot.....I see the distinction now

Cooley is a fine player if he's healthy, I just don't see too much of a need personally.

#56 pOpCoRnPoPpEr

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,940
  • Reputation: 15
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:08 AM

Well, this from your source says he was.

http://www.pro-footb...2005/allpro.htm


thanks

#57 Kakarot

Kakarot

    Aggie Pride!

  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,840
  • Reputation: 705
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:19 AM

Well, since Kellen is no longer available I'd rather us bring back the shocker. Still don't want Cooley

#58 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,292
  • Reputation: 3,416
HUDDLER

Posted 22 May 2012 - 12:10 PM

Cooley is a high risk, high reward proposition. Barnidge's development may be a better bet and/or investment.

#59 KillerKat

KillerKat

    GTFO Shula

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,589
  • Reputation: 4,737
HUDDLER

Posted 14 May 2013 - 11:25 AM

Cooley may actually be available:

 

 

 

The Washington Post says it appears the Redskins have moved on from free agent TE Chris Cooley.
 
As of last month, Cooley hadn't heard from the Redskins. They also gave rookie RB Jawan Jamison his No. 47 jersey. Cooley was on the street last season until Fred Davis popped his Achilles' tendon in Week 7. May 14 - 12:04 PM

 

 

 

http://www.rotoworld...2811/player?r=1

 

I'd sign him in a heartbeat.

 



#60 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,296
  • Reputation: 8,126
HUDDLER

Posted 14 May 2013 - 11:55 AM

Cooley may actually be available:


http://www.rotoworld...2811/player?r=1

I'd sign him in a heartbeat.


This is news? I had heard they moved on from him quite some time ago... Bad thread bump.