Jump to content

- - - - -

Beason questionable for Week 1

  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 Panthers4lyfe


    Senior Member

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 428
  • Reputation: 44

Posted 21 August 2012 - 09:48 AM


I don't know if I buy this.. If he has a chance to play this sunday night, why would he be 50-50 to play 3 weeks from now? Doesn't make sense to me. But I fully expect Beason to be out there opening day, and I don't think he'd let himself miss it.

#2 chknwing


    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,185
  • Reputation: 6,117

Posted 21 August 2012 - 09:54 AM

well I wouldnt believe it either. Announcing this kind of info this early will just allow teams to better game plan. Doubt Rivera would give the competition any kind of advantage.

#3 rayzor


    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:01 AM

Posted Image lol

#4 Snake


    Rivera did What???

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,641
  • Reputation: 1,228

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:03 AM

Hamstrings are tricky. They prob want know if he will start till that week.

#5 beastson


    Philly Cheese Steak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,727
  • Reputation: 1,833

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:03 AM

Huh? That's 3 weeks away... how the fug can he be questionable

#6 zebrainz



  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 403
  • Reputation: 13

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:04 AM

Here is the CO article rotoworld used to make that conclusion (listed as their source):

The CO article also says Davis is further along in his recovery than Beason, ???. I just think that rotoworld is taking the verbage 'hope to play in panthers opener' and converting it to 'questionable for game 1' for their fantasy prognostication purposes. Not really that much of a reach on rotoworld's part, neither player has seen the field in pads, in active competition vs. another team yet.

The real sigh of relief for both those players won't come until they have a few regular season games under their belt performing at a high level. At least not for me.

#7 jayflip


    vaya con dios

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • posts: 2,969
  • Reputation: 1,501
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:16 AM

I would love to see Beast out there, but you must ask yourself, last year, when week 2 was upon us, did you wish we let Beason come along more slowly?

#8 PhillyB


    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,945
  • Reputation: 18,371
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:17 AM

i'd rather he not come in til week three and be 100% than force him in early and lose him again by week three.

if the preseason is any indicator, the current group of guys should do a decent job holding down the fort until he returns.

#9 ShutDwn


    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 579
  • Reputation: 79

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:17 AM

Kuechly is looking like a better pick every day. I'm fuging tired of linebackers who can't play. I might as well erase them from memory until they actually play. They just create an overestimation of the team in the fan's eyes.

Thomas Davis is practically done and Beason isn't that far off from being like him. I know he's only missed last season, but he was wasn't 100% in game 1 last year and he came back for like two practices this year before sitting out more.

It just seems like these guys "get healthy" but they are really only ready for practice, not a game.

Every year: "Once we get player X back we'll be great!!!"

#10 catfang


    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,793
  • Reputation: 1,464

Posted 21 August 2012 - 10:19 AM

sit beason as long as necessary. I don't want him out for the season again.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users