Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panthro

14.1%

148 posts in this topic

The rich use tax accountants and paid for rules to save millions, then they put it into tax havens. The poor might get a few thousand they use to buy things they need, helping the economy.

God you and the other flaming liberals in here are truly fuging idiots.

His effective rate was 14% because he donated nearly 1/3 if his income to charity. He donated to help people who need help. If he was a greedy bastard, he would have just not made those donations and paid a higher effective tax rate. If he had done that, he would have netted more money.

Your hatred blinds you to logic....it more likely you are just an angry and plain dumb person.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rich use tax accountants and paid for rules to save millions, then they put it into tax havens. The poor might get a few thousand they use to buy things they need, helping the economy.

Or the rich buy expensive cars, houses, vacation homes etc which help the econom... while the poor give it coke dealers which helps the columbian economy.

Fwiw, neither my statement nor yours is correct. Each individual person handles it differently, according to his or her own desires, experience, upbringing and beliefs. I have known both wealthy and poor people and there really isn't any, all rich people do this, or all poor people do that standard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God you and the other flaming liberals in here are truly fuging idiots.

His effective rate was 14% because he donated nearly 1/3 if his income to charity. He donated to help people who need help. If he was a greedy bastard, he would have just not made those donations and paid a higher effective tax rate. If he had done that, he would have netted more money.

Your hatred blinds you to logic....it more likely you are just an angry and plain dumb person.

Trying to have a logical discussion with a liberal is a lost cause.

The average liberal IQ is well below the curve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God you and the other flaming liberals in here are truly fuging idiots.

His effective rate was 14% because he donated nearly 1/3 if his income to charity. He donated to help people who need help. If he was a greedy bastard, he would have just not made those donations and paid a higher effective tax rate. If he had done that, he would have netted more money.

Your hatred blinds you to logic....it more likely you are just an angry and plain dumb person.

He didn't donate to people who need help, he tithed to the Church of Mormon. There's a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what is fair share nowadays?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't donate to people who need help, he tithed to the Church of Mormon. There's a difference.

Yes because the Church of Mormon doesn't do anything charitable for the needy ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Membership fees being tax deductible amuse me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes because the Church of Mormon doesn't do anything charitable for the needy ;)

Not really

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom Cruise donates to The Church of Scientology and writes it off as charity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes because the Church of Mormon doesn't do anything charitable for the needy ;)

Mormons are bound by their doctrine to give to the Church of Mormon. They have no choice, it's not something he did out of the goodness of his heart. It's not a voluntary donation like in most religions other than Scientology.

It goes to building stuff like this, very very little to actual charity.

5360_SaltLakeUT_hr.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites