Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Carolina-Chuck 2013 Mock Draft 3.0


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#21 SOJA

SOJA

    Official Panthers Fan

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,481
  • Reputation: 1,747
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 10:49 AM

I'd be ok with this, but would rather have Vaccaro if available

#22 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • Joined: 05-August 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,745
  • Reputation: 509
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 04:07 PM

Star forced way more double teams than Hankins did in those two highlight videos. He was also triple teamed at times. I personally like Star better.

Also Hankins played mostly the 5, while Star played the NT, 3, and 5.

#23 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,328
  • Reputation: 1,848
SUPPORTER

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:50 AM

IMO, the best analogy of Star vs Hankins is Dareus vs Fairley. Not saying either will be as good or bad as Dareus or Fairley, but they seem to have parallel skill sets. I preferred Dareus then (by a lot) and prefer Star now (by a little). Obviously, it's still early though.

#24 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,430
  • Reputation: 113
  • LocationTulsa, OK
HUDDLER

Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:59 AM

I thought Star looked like a Top10 pick in the 1st quarter of the game, but he tends to get less dominant as he gets tired. I guess that is my biggest issue with him. He was firing off the ball extremely fast for a big man.. and that must be what scouts see. If they can get his stamina up, I think he is well worth the Top10 pick. The thing that 'to me' that made Fletcher Cox the better prospect, is the motor that Cox possesses.. he was playing at that level for 4 quarters.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users