If Packers lose this weekend... (2-4)
#1
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:24 PM
Especially with the way Rodgers performed last year. Don't want to turn this into a race thing, (I'm white) but I think Cam is taking way more grief for his performances than Rodgers is for his.
GB seemingly has the defense and obviously a potent Offense (see last year)
It just dawned on me that they'd be 2-4... Which honestly makes me feel better about where we're at as a franchise with a 2nd year QB and coaching staff.
Just trying to make myself feel better I guess
I'd love to hear y'alls thoughts though
#2
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:30 PM
#3
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:30 PM
hate to say it .. but it's true
.. and things just got much worse with Kalil going down for the season
#4
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:32 PM
The Panthers are having a down existence.
#5
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:40 PM
nobody bats an eye at us sucking because that's kind of how things have gone for this team for several years.
#6
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:44 PM
#7
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:59 PM
#8
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:09 PM
#9
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:19 PM
They're one regular ref from being 3-2. Most everyone looks bad against SF and Indy just exploded in an emotional win last week. They're a team that has had a really bad break and played a really good team for 2 of their loses. We just suck right now. So no them being 2-4 doesn't make me feel better.
They are not one 'regular' ref from being 3-2, if there were regular refs they would be 2-3 still... If you watched the whole game you would see the call that gave GB the only TD to put them ahead. That call was WORSE than the catch in the endzone, that one just happened to be at the end of the game. Seattle outplayed GB all game, and there were horrid calls both ways, if the game was called properly, Seattle would still come out on top. Thats not me being biased either, I admit the call was terrible. But def. not the worst call that game. Those scab refs almost cost the hawks a victory.
#10
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:24 PM
They are not one 'regular' ref from being 3-2, if there were regular refs they would be 2-3 still... If you watched the whole game you would see the call that gave GB the only TD to put them ahead. That call was WORSE than the catch in the endzone, that one just happened to be at the end of the game. Seattle outplayed GB all game, and there were horrid calls both ways, if the game was called properly, Seattle would still come out on top. Thats not me being biased either, I admit the call was terrible. But def. not the worst call that game. Those scab refs almost cost the hawks a victory.
Worst call of the game was the defensive interference call on GB before that.
#11
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:26 PM
Worst call of the game was the defensive interference call on GB before that.
I don't disagree with you there. But the PI call on Browner was worse than the TD, I mean honestly, it's a crapshoot. But bottom line is Seattle wouldn't have needed a drive if the game was called properly. If you look at the numbers, GB was flat outplayed, officiating made the game into a crapshoot
#12
Guest_Tom Cat_*
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:28 PM
#13
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:34 PM
#14
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:44 PM
#15
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:45 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





