Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

If Packers lose this weekend... (2-4)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
45 replies to this topic

#1 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:24 PM

That's right, the Green Bay Packers will be 2-4.... Does this make you feel better about our record? I mean, this is a team everyone expected to own people...

Especially with the way Rodgers performed last year. Don't want to turn this into a race thing, (I'm white) but I think Cam is taking way more grief for his performances than Rodgers is for his.

GB seemingly has the defense and obviously a potent Offense (see last year)

It just dawned on me that they'd be 2-4... Which honestly makes me feel better about where we're at as a franchise with a 2nd year QB and coaching staff.

Just trying to make myself feel better I guess

I'd love to hear y'alls thoughts though

#2 SuperJTheGreat

SuperJTheGreat

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,415
  • Reputation: 1,667
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:30 PM

Still have one more win this us.

#3 xtheronx

xtheronx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 955
  • Reputation: 174
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:30 PM

.. we're terrible .. regardless of how many games GB wins .. maybe GB sucks too idk .. but either way .. we're still awful lol

hate to say it .. but it's true

.. and things just got much worse with Kalil going down for the season

#4 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • Joined: 03-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,186
  • Reputation: 4,181
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:32 PM

The Packers might be having a down year.


The Panthers are having a down existence.

#5 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    Jerry Richard$on and Gettledouche apologist

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 12,245
  • Reputation: 5,678
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:40 PM

the reason this comparison is being made is because they went 15-1 last season and won it all the year before that. if the packers slump to 2-4 it'll be shocking to most onlookers

nobody bats an eye at us sucking because that's kind of how things have gone for this team for several years.

#6 Jrock88

Jrock88

    huddle vet

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,473
  • Reputation: 249
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:44 PM

hahahaha that sig is funny

#7 capfolly

capfolly

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 635
  • Reputation: 92
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:59 PM

They're one regular ref from being 3-2. Most everyone looks bad against SF and Indy just exploded in an emotional win last week. They're a team that has had a really bad break and played a really good team for 2 of their loses. We just suck right now. So no them being 2-4 doesn't make me feel better.

#8 Jesse

Jesse

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 30-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,435
  • Reputation: 432
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:09 PM

It doesn't make us any better if they're just less shitty.

#9 Hawkfanadam

Hawkfanadam

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-March 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 326
  • Reputation: 97
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:19 PM

They're one regular ref from being 3-2. Most everyone looks bad against SF and Indy just exploded in an emotional win last week. They're a team that has had a really bad break and played a really good team for 2 of their loses. We just suck right now. So no them being 2-4 doesn't make me feel better.


They are not one 'regular' ref from being 3-2, if there were regular refs they would be 2-3 still... If you watched the whole game you would see the call that gave GB the only TD to put them ahead. That call was WORSE than the catch in the endzone, that one just happened to be at the end of the game. Seattle outplayed GB all game, and there were horrid calls both ways, if the game was called properly, Seattle would still come out on top. Thats not me being biased either, I admit the call was terrible. But def. not the worst call that game. Those scab refs almost cost the hawks a victory.

#10 capfolly

capfolly

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 635
  • Reputation: 92
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:24 PM

They are not one 'regular' ref from being 3-2, if there were regular refs they would be 2-3 still... If you watched the whole game you would see the call that gave GB the only TD to put them ahead. That call was WORSE than the catch in the endzone, that one just happened to be at the end of the game. Seattle outplayed GB all game, and there were horrid calls both ways, if the game was called properly, Seattle would still come out on top. Thats not me being biased either, I admit the call was terrible. But def. not the worst call that game. Those scab refs almost cost the hawks a victory.


Worst call of the game was the defensive interference call on GB before that.

#11 Hawkfanadam

Hawkfanadam

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-March 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 326
  • Reputation: 97
HUDDLER

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:26 PM

Worst call of the game was the defensive interference call on GB before that.



I don't disagree with you there. But the PI call on Browner was worse than the TD, I mean honestly, it's a crapshoot. But bottom line is Seattle wouldn't have needed a drive if the game was called properly. If you look at the numbers, GB was flat outplayed, officiating made the game into a crapshoot

#12 Guest_Tom Cat_*

Guest_Tom Cat_*
Guests

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:28 PM

too bad Cam couldnt hold Aaron Rodgers jock