Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

If Packers lose this weekend... (2-4)


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,470 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:24 PM

That's right, the Green Bay Packers will be 2-4.... Does this make you feel better about our record? I mean, this is a team everyone expected to own people...

Especially with the way Rodgers performed last year. Don't want to turn this into a race thing, (I'm white) but I think Cam is taking way more grief for his performances than Rodgers is for his.

GB seemingly has the defense and obviously a potent Offense (see last year)

It just dawned on me that they'd be 2-4... Which honestly makes me feel better about where we're at as a franchise with a 2nd year QB and coaching staff.

Just trying to make myself feel better I guess

I'd love to hear y'alls thoughts though

#2 SuperJTheGreat

SuperJTheGreat

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:30 PM

Still have one more win this us.

#3 xtheronx

xtheronx

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 925 posts
  • LocationCharleston, South Carolina

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:30 PM

.. we're terrible .. regardless of how many games GB wins .. maybe GB sucks too idk .. but either way .. we're still awful lol

hate to say it .. but it's true

.. and things just got much worse with Kalil going down for the season

#4 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,821 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:32 PM

The Packers might be having a down year.


The Panthers are having a down existence.

#5 Nicks To The Colts

Nicks To The Colts

    shitpost around the clock

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,340 posts
  • LocationChapel Hill

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:40 PM

the reason this comparison is being made is because they went 15-1 last season and won it all the year before that. if the packers slump to 2-4 it'll be shocking to most onlookers

nobody bats an eye at us sucking because that's kind of how things have gone for this team for several years.

#6 Jrock88

Jrock88

    huddle vet

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:44 PM

hahahaha that sig is funny

#7 capfolly

capfolly

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:59 PM

They're one regular ref from being 3-2. Most everyone looks bad against SF and Indy just exploded in an emotional win last week. They're a team that has had a really bad break and played a really good team for 2 of their loses. We just suck right now. So no them being 2-4 doesn't make me feel better.

#8 Jesse

Jesse

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,251 posts
  • LocationVirginia

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:09 PM

It doesn't make us any better if they're just less shitty.

#9 Hawkfanadam

Hawkfanadam

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 285 posts
  • LocationVancouver, Washington

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:19 PM

They're one regular ref from being 3-2. Most everyone looks bad against SF and Indy just exploded in an emotional win last week. They're a team that has had a really bad break and played a really good team for 2 of their loses. We just suck right now. So no them being 2-4 doesn't make me feel better.


They are not one 'regular' ref from being 3-2, if there were regular refs they would be 2-3 still... If you watched the whole game you would see the call that gave GB the only TD to put them ahead. That call was WORSE than the catch in the endzone, that one just happened to be at the end of the game. Seattle outplayed GB all game, and there were horrid calls both ways, if the game was called properly, Seattle would still come out on top. Thats not me being biased either, I admit the call was terrible. But def. not the worst call that game. Those scab refs almost cost the hawks a victory.

#10 capfolly

capfolly

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:24 PM

They are not one 'regular' ref from being 3-2, if there were regular refs they would be 2-3 still... If you watched the whole game you would see the call that gave GB the only TD to put them ahead. That call was WORSE than the catch in the endzone, that one just happened to be at the end of the game. Seattle outplayed GB all game, and there were horrid calls both ways, if the game was called properly, Seattle would still come out on top. Thats not me being biased either, I admit the call was terrible. But def. not the worst call that game. Those scab refs almost cost the hawks a victory.


Worst call of the game was the defensive interference call on GB before that.

#11 Hawkfanadam

Hawkfanadam

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 285 posts
  • LocationVancouver, Washington

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:26 PM

Worst call of the game was the defensive interference call on GB before that.



I don't disagree with you there. But the PI call on Browner was worse than the TD, I mean honestly, it's a crapshoot. But bottom line is Seattle wouldn't have needed a drive if the game was called properly. If you look at the numbers, GB was flat outplayed, officiating made the game into a crapshoot

#12 Guest_Tom Cat_*

Guest_Tom Cat_*
  • Guests

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:28 PM

too bad Cam couldnt hold Aaron Rodgers jock

#13 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,183 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:34 PM

Didn't see the game. But have read and heard quite a bit about that game. That game was a driving force in getting the real refs back. And it was probably the worst called game of the short lived lives of replacement refs.

#14 Frash Brastard

Frash Brastard

    The Frashmaker

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,613 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:44 PM

what underachieving prestigious team were we comparing ourselves to at this time last year?

#15 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,962 posts
  • Locationtied to your basement wall

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:45 PM

honestly we have the talent to win. It's about calling a good game as a coach, making good decisions, and executing. We probably have a better offensive team then the Packers, we just don't use them correctly.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.