Is anybody else listening to WFNZ?
#16
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:40 PM
LOL they were cracking on his reading level.
#17
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:41 PM
I'm listening to WFNZ on my computer, but has anyone changed the dial over to ESPN730 and heard what they've been saying?
You should listen to 730. It's a much better show in general - especially today.
#18
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:45 PM
I'm convinced sports radio is for dumbshits only.
Still not as dumb as this place can get.
#19
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:45 PM
#20
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:47 PM
Thanks for sharing your "wisdom" with us Marc, LOL
#21
Posted 22 October 2012 - 02:47 PM
Still not as dumb as this place can get.
If you think people on the radio have any more knowledge or credibility than people on here, than I'm not surprised that you enjoy listening to that drivel. You seem to be their target audience: the people who honestly believe they are tuning in to people that know more than the average joe. Radio is just as dumb as this place.
#22
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:09 PM
Radio is just as dumb as this place.
...I think that's what I just said...and then some.
If Radio didn't screen their calls it would be Huddle Radio. The intelligence level here is much lower than the level of the radio.
In the rare event I listen to the radio, I'm not hearing someone call in about what someone put on twitter...or talking about trading Jon Beason halfway through the Seahawks game.
#23
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:28 PM
#24
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:30 PM
#25
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:35 PM
#26
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:36 PM
...I think that's what I just said...and then some.
If Radio didn't screen their calls it would be Huddle Radio. The intelligence level here is much lower than the level of the radio.
In the rare event I listen to the radio, I'm not hearing someone call in about what someone put on twitter...or talking about trading Jon Beason halfway through the Seahawks game.
Ha you are correct. The dudes that call in to the radio are no geniuses, but the average Huddler isn't exactly on the back end of the Stanford Binet curve either.
#27
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:46 PM
Marc just said Cam is playing for his job. He also said Luck is making chicken salad out of chicken poo, while Cam is making chicken poo out of chicken salad. So... now the panthers are good, its just Cams fault. Now I remember why I don't listen to the drive anymore.
He is all over Luck, and talks about how Luck is better then Cam and can read defenses but the stats show differently.
Luck 1674 yards, 6.7 yards per pass, 53% passing, 7 TD's, 7 INT's, 115 rushing yards, 3 TD's.
Newton 1387 yards, 8.0 yards per pass, 58% passing, 5 TD's, 6 INT's, 273 rushing yards, 3 TD's.
I don't think you can say with a straight face that Luck reads defenses better when he only completes 53% of his passes.
#28
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:50 PM
Marc just said Cam is playing for his job. He also said Luck is making chicken salad out of chicken poo, while Cam is making chicken poo out of chicken salad. So... now the panthers are good, its just Cams fault. Now I remember why I don't listen to the drive anymore.
This dude eats chicken salad made out of poop!
#29
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:53 PM
It's laughable that anyone would use Luck as the example of a guy who is getting it done, when there's a guy in his rookie class who has been 10 times better (RG 3).
#30
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:54 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





