Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

For the future of the team.. Im glad we lost.


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 PantherTrain84

PantherTrain84

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 11-September 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 684
  • Reputation: -9
TROLLOLOL

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:10 PM

First off im glad we lost because that means one more nail in the coffin of Rivera, the LAST thing we need was to "finish strong" and give our new GM the temptation of keeping him. If losing means we guarantee RR will be gone, so be it!

2nd, the better draft position we havem the better our chances of a potential GM wanting to come here knowing he will be coming in with a good hand come draft day. I would rather go 3-13 with a top 3 pick as opposed to 6-10 or 7-9 with a crappy draft position. I was hoping all day we lost so these two things happen.

#2 Kettle

Kettle

    I'm Stainless.

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,442
  • Reputation: 672
  • LocationThe Brew Wing
HUDDLER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:13 PM

I just don't see how we will get to three wins.

#3 punkpanther

punkpanther

    Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 124
  • Reputation: 38
HUDDLER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:15 PM

the loser of the KC game will probably get the first pick.

#4 punkpanther

punkpanther

    Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 124
  • Reputation: 38
HUDDLER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:17 PM

on a side note, is there anybody worth taking #1 that is not a QB? I don't really follow college.

#5 unicar15

unicar15

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,783
  • Reputation: 191
HUDDLER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:18 PM

Only if we get a GM who will come in and actually be competent with the picks. Get excited about an OT with the 2nd overall pick...woo hoo

#6 UNCrules2187

UNCrules2187

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 2,496
  • Reputation: 1,969
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:18 PM

There are some really good lineman (both offensive and defensive) in this draft. We will definitely be taking either an OT or DT with our first pick, IMO. I'm leaning towards OT.

#7 Fox007

Fox007

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,311
  • Reputation: 1,490
HUDDLER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:22 PM

Maybe if we sustain about 120 more tackles for loss doing the option runs Chud will finally switch to a real offense.













Na, we know he isn't that good of a coach.

#8 Cape Fear Cat

Cape Fear Cat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 831
  • Reputation: 284
HUDDLER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:23 PM

Kiper was saying yesterday that there really isn't anyone that's a clear cut, heads above everyone else pick in this year's draft. Even if we do get a high pick, there seems to be slim pickings to choose from.

#9 punkpanther

punkpanther

    Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 124
  • Reputation: 38
HUDDLER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:25 PM

Kiper was saying yesterday that there really isn't anyone that's a clear cut, heads above everyone else pick in this year's draft. Even if we do get a high pick, there seems to be slim pickings to choose from.

Figures, just our luck.

#10 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    DeAngelo Williams/Steve Smith Huddle: Est 2003

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 11,629
  • Reputation: 5,037
  • LocationChapel Hill
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 November 2012 - 06:49 PM

on a side note, is there anybody worth taking #1 that is not a QB? I don't really follow college.


star lotulelei (massive DT from utah) seems to be the front runner although luke joeckel (OT from texas a&m) is flying up draft boards.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users