Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

OJ and the serial killer


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,976 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:46 PM

http://news.yahoo.co...-194119077.html





According to Clay Rogers, Glen bragged to him about killing more than 70 people. (Glen later said the claim was a joke.) And Clay says Glen told him he had been "partying" with Brown Simpson prior to her June 12, 1994, killing.
According to the documentary, O.J. Simpson knew Glen—who was working as a house painter near Brown Simpson's Brentwood home at the time of the murders—and had paid him to steal a pair of $20,000 earrings he had given her. According to Clay, Glen boasted he was going to "take her down" and said that O.J. told him to kill "the bitch" if necessary.



Interesting theory about an old story... Dude certainly looks like a serial killer/Billy Ray Cyrus.

Posted Image

#2 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,400 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:29 PM

http://usatoday30.us...index/nns25.htm

No

#3 Harris Aballah

Harris Aballah

    Fayette-Villian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,519 posts
  • Locationnorth carolina

Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:27 PM

Damn sure looks like he'd kill a beer!!!!!

#4 SZ James

SZ James

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,766 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:42 PM

Doesn't matter really what the other dude looks like or if he's really a serial killer.

OJ did it.

/thread

#5 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,976 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:48 PM

Doesn't matter really what the other dude looks like or if he's really a serial killer.

OJ did it.

/thread


Are you being serious or sarcastic, I can never tell. fwiw I do think OJ did it... and they could have convicted him if the police hadn't been incompetent and racist...

#6 FurdTurgason

FurdTurgason

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 954 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:51 PM

Garcetti wanted to make a statement and he sure did.

#7 SZ James

SZ James

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,766 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:52 PM

Are you being serious or sarcastic, I can never tell. fwiw I do think OJ did it... and they could have convicted him if the police hadn't been incompetent and racist...


OJ did do it srsly.

#8 SZ James

SZ James

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,766 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:57 PM

I mean even if he paid someone else to do it or whatever he's still guilty of, gasp, a conspiracy.

#9 googoodan

googoodan

    Memberest

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,646 posts
  • LocationBayside

Posted 21 November 2012 - 02:55 AM

Mark Fuhrman was the only person to "find" evidence at Simpson's home when he scaled the fence by himself. The glove he found had blood from all three individuals, and OJ had cuts on his finger. Yet, there was no cut on the gloves. Fuhrman took the fifth when asked if he planted evidence. A single strand of blonde hair was found on the glove Fuhrman "found." I never heard any DNA evidence confirming it was Nicole's hair. Simpson says he was hitting golf balls. Kato Kaelin heard thumps on the wall... golf balls maybe?

OJ didn't do it.

#10 FurdTurgason

FurdTurgason

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 954 posts

Posted 21 November 2012 - 04:18 AM

It was a crime of passion. Her head was almost completely cut off. Her lover was killed right next to her.

Ninety nine point nine nine nine percent of the time it's the ex in these situations.

Motive is everything.

Then you had OJ making jokes about killing his wife while making an exercise video. Then you had the 911 tapes. Then you had him running away with a disguise on hand. Then you had his suicide note. Then you had the timeline.

The same guy who convicted the Manson family said he could have gotten OJ convicted on his running away in the Bronco alone.

#11 googoodan

googoodan

    Memberest

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,646 posts
  • LocationBayside

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:29 AM

Riding in the back seat of a vehicle does not put blood on your hands.
Maybe if LAPD hadn't collected 8mL of blood at the scene and only had 6.5mL make it to the crime lab, I would believe the blood evidence found at OJ's home.

Maybe if someone besides Fuhrman found evidence at the home, I would believe it. Better yet, maybe if Fuhrman didn't transport evidence from the scene to OJ's house, I would believe it.

Maybe if either of the gloves had any amount of blood around them.... How does a blood "soaked" glove not have any other blood around it? You can't make a snow angel without putting footprints in the snow, and you can't drop a bloodily glove without leaving a bloody trail leading to it. Maybe if the gloves had cuts that matched the cuts on OJ's fingers.

But none of that is important, but riding in the back seat of an SUV is (keep in mind he was on the telephone with the police during the trip). They were driving 35mph down an interstate. Not exactly the speed someone on the lam would be moving.

#12 FurdTurgason

FurdTurgason

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 954 posts

Posted 21 November 2012 - 11:29 AM

Riding in the back seat of a vehicle does not put blood on your hands.
Maybe if LAPD hadn't collected 8mL of blood at the scene and only had 6.5mL make it to the crime lab, I would believe the blood evidence found at OJ's home.

Maybe if someone besides Fuhrman found evidence at the home, I would believe it. Better yet, maybe if Fuhrman didn't transport evidence from the scene to OJ's house, I would believe it.

Maybe if either of the gloves had any amount of blood around them.... How does a blood "soaked" glove not have any other blood around it? You can't make a snow angel without putting footprints in the snow, and you can't drop a bloodily glove without leaving a bloody trail leading to it. Maybe if the gloves had cuts that matched the cuts on OJ's fingers.

But none of that is important, but riding in the back seat of an SUV is (keep in mind he was on the telephone with the police during the trip). They were driving 35mph down an interstate. Not exactly the speed someone on the lam would be moving.



If you know you are innocent, you don't run. It was Al Cowlings on the phone, telling police that OJ was threatening to kill himself. Trust me, I heard all the "you don't know what you'd do in that situation" defenses with Rae Carruth.

#13 FurdTurgason

FurdTurgason

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 954 posts

Posted 21 November 2012 - 11:30 AM

And like Larry King said (a man who would know), when the police told OJ his ex-wife had been murdered, it's what he didn't say that was damning. He didn't say "Which one?"

#14 googoodan

googoodan

    Memberest

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,646 posts
  • LocationBayside

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:41 PM

If you know you are innocent, you don't run. It was Al Cowlings on the phone, telling police that OJ was threatening to kill himself. Trust me, I heard all the "you don't know what you'd do in that situation" defenses with Rae Carruth.


This, my friend, is called media sensationalism. Do some reading into what was really going on. OJ had spoken to the police earlier that day. He agreed to turn himself in after he speaks with family. A 35 MPH trip to a family members house with police following isn't a chase; it's an escort.

#15 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,779 posts
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon

Posted 21 November 2012 - 01:45 PM

Amazed that anyone with the intelligence to use a computer ACTUALLY believes OJ is innocent.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com