Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Didn't CJ get a sack this game?


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:37 AM

It's not showing on any of the box score. But I remember a bumbled snap and CJ touching Foles down.

Isn't that a sack?

#2 OnlyPantherFaninMaine

OnlyPantherFaninMaine

    All In.

  • Joined: 04-September 09
  • posts: 6,831
  • Reputation: 3,366
  • LocationBrooklyn, NY
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:39 AM

Yeah I thought that as well. I figured they would give him a sack for that play thought I'm not totally sure how it works.


The Kraken was breaking bodies today though...per usual.

#3 Mage

Mage

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,654
  • Reputation: 801
HUDDLER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:39 AM

It's because it was designed to be a run play. Looked like Foles was going to toss it. They might review the play if Carolina cares enough to ask them to see if it was going to be a pass or run (can usually tell by offensive line movement) but by how easy Johnson got through, I'd say it was probably going to be a toss.

#4 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
  • LocationAlaska
HUDDLER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:41 AM

It's because it was designed to be a run play. Looked like Foles was going to toss it. They might review the play if Carolina cares enough to ask them to see if it was going to be a pass or run (can usually tell by offensive line movement) but by how easy Johnson got through, I'd say it was probably going to be a toss.


WTF are u talking about?????????????

If anything the refs screwed him out of the sack by blowing the play dead prior to CJ getting to him which was BS (though not unusual for refs to screw the team or a player over)

Further more, even if it were a designed QB run, if he's tackled behind the line of scrimmage it's still a sack genius... You obviously don't even know the rules.... Smh

Do you people even watch the games? This place has gotten absolutely ridiculous!

#5 Rubi

Rubi

    Squid Smasher

  • Joined: 28-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,376
  • Reputation: 751
  • LocationCharlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:42 AM

Yeah I thought that as well. I figured they would give him a sack for that play thought I'm not totally sure how it works.


The Kraken was breaking bodies today though...per usual.


He's been a surprise this year.

I was calling for his head in the offseason

He's been impressive. He might be the largest gunner on punt plays in NFL history as well...

#6 OnlyPantherFaninMaine

OnlyPantherFaninMaine

    All In.

  • Joined: 04-September 09
  • posts: 6,831
  • Reputation: 3,366
  • LocationBrooklyn, NY
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:46 AM

He's been a surprise this year.

I was calling for his head in the offseason

He's been impressive. He might be the largest gunner on punt plays in NFL history as well...


Year 3 is usually when DEs start to 'get it' so I was reserving judgment on Hardy until after this season. The tandem of CJ and Hardy with a dose of Dwan Edwards and Alexander has been a big reason for this defenses turn around.

Big fan of Hardy and hope we can keep him along with CJ for a long time. Throw in a beast DT like Star in the draft and this D-Line and LB core should be a top front 7 for years to come.

#7 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • posts: 15,554
  • Reputation: 2,800
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:51 AM

I'm guessing it was ruled a TFL since Foles fumbled the ball and then picked it up and attempted to advance it, before dropping on it.

I hope the Panthers ask the league to take another look at it, I think CJ should be credited with a sack on that one.

#8 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,654
  • Reputation: 6,637
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:52 AM

I think'll be changed to a sack once it's reviewed.

#9 YoungPanthers89

YoungPanthers89

    Lucy Snorebush

  • Joined: 06-February 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,497
  • Reputation: 1,957
  • LocationNC
HUDDLER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:54 AM

WTF are u talking about?????????????

If anything the refs screwed him out of the sack by blowing the play dead prior to CJ getting to him which was BS (though not unusual for refs to screw the team or a player over)

Further more, even if it were a designed QB run, if he's tackled behind the line of scrimmage it's still a sack genius... You obviously don't even know the rules.... Smh

Do you people even watch the games? This place has gotten absolutely ridiculous!


Calm down...and if it is a designed run it wouldn't be a sack

#10 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,950
  • Reputation: 18,383
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:55 AM

WTF are u talking about?????????????

If anything the refs screwed him out of the sack by blowing the play dead prior to CJ getting to him which was BS (though not unusual for refs to screw the team or a player over)

Further more, even if it were a designed QB run, if he's tackled behind the line of scrimmage it's still a sack genius... You obviously don't even know the rules.... Smh

Do you people even watch the games? This place has gotten absolutely ridiculous!


might wanna tone it down a little there scooter, new no tolerance policy on flailing personal attacks and bombastic condemnations.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users