Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

PFF says Kuechly is struggling in Coverage


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,636
  • Reputation: 3,571
HUDDLER

Posted 08 December 2012 - 07:31 PM

Rookie Trials

Lauded for his coverage skills coming out of Boston College, the performance of rookie linebacker Luke Kuechly again provided evidence that the NFL is quite the step up from college competition. Logging a negative grade in coverage for the eighth time this season, Kuechly allowed all six passes thrown into his coverage to be caught — four of them went for first downs — for 76 yards, and especially struggled covering Chiefs tight end Tony Moeaki. However, his struggles in the passing game shouldn’t overshadow his improvement in run defense. He notched six defensive stops — tied for the team-high — and demonstrated the quick play recognition that makes him such a great prospect. This was on display at 7:30 of the third quarter, when, at the snap, he exploded into the backfield to stop Peyton Hillis for a 5-yard loss

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/12/04/refo-panthers-chiefs-week-13/

#2 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,126
  • Reputation: 5,285
Moderators

Posted 08 December 2012 - 07:35 PM

I find it odd Rivera has referenced his scheme saying they intentionally are a aggressive run defense.

So if that is true.....he could be asking Luke to overplay the run.

Luke does appear to get sucked into play action....but I find it odd Rivera had responded before about teams attacking there aggreesive run D scheme

#3 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,653
  • Reputation: 6,636
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 December 2012 - 07:37 PM

Agree, Luke gets sucked in on play action pretty easily and I haven't been overly impressed with his coverage, like the VJax TD.

However, he's a rookie and has plenty of time to grow and learn. He's still a beast.

#4 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,387
  • Reputation: 4,551
HUDDLER

Posted 08 December 2012 - 07:38 PM

I've noticed this from Kuechly as well. His pass coverage is something he definately needs to work on.

#5 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,126
  • Reputation: 5,285
Moderators

Posted 08 December 2012 - 07:39 PM

I've noticed this from Kuechly as well. His pass coverage is something he definately needs to work on.


You do have to wonder if scheme plays into it.....bc in terms if being a coverage LB he was probably the best prospect in that regard in some time

#6 xtheronx

xtheronx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 953
  • Reputation: 170
  • LocationCharleston, South Carolina
HUDDLER

Posted 08 December 2012 - 08:00 PM

You do have to wonder if scheme plays into it.....bc in terms if being a coverage LB he was probably the best prospect in that regard in some time


that .. and the shotty play of Nakamura .. imagine how he would have looked this year with an Ed Reed type player back there

Nakamura makes a lot of players around him look bad if you simply look at statistics .. if you watch the games you quickly realize a lot of the bad stats are rooted in his horrible play

as great as R Lewis is/was .. his stats would not be the same without Reed .. although he'd still be a great leader

A decent safety is huge for LB's and CB's .. and we've sucked for a while!

#7 mustangcat1

mustangcat1

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • posts: 7
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 08 December 2012 - 08:03 PM

There are very few linebackers in the NFL that are good in coverage.

#8 broseidon

broseidon

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 285
  • Reputation: 46
  • LocationYour daughters dorm room
HUDDLER

Posted 08 December 2012 - 08:25 PM

I find it odd Rivera has referenced his scheme saying they intentionally are a aggressive run defense.

So if that is true.....he could be asking Luke to overplay the run.

Luke does appear to get sucked into play action....but I find it odd Rivera had responded before about teams attacking there aggreesive run D scheme


Who is a "Run First Offense" in this league anymore?

#9 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,636
  • Reputation: 3,571
HUDDLER

Posted 08 December 2012 - 08:33 PM

Yeah, Kuechly is a huge sucker for play-action, hell, the entire defense is.

#10 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 5,770
  • Reputation: 2,308
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 December 2012 - 08:57 PM

not worried.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users