Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PantherTrain84

With Joeckel likely gone, I think we got our next franchise LT..

31 posts in this topic

So being bored I was looking at Walterfootball for draft prospects outside the top 5 incase we pick closer to 8-12, I saw them mocking Taylor Lewan to Miami at 15, hes the next LT after Joeckel. So I went and dug up film on him on youtube and this guy is a absolute beast! This is a good 8 minute vid and he just manhandles his guy big time. http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=2EhJdcnRBxo

Thoughts on Taylor Lewan? I dont watch college ball so does anyone else know much about him? He looks like a stud in that vid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly think A&M's RT Jake Matthews is better (including as a LT). He's extremely athletic, and really just needs to bulk up some. Has great instincts and footwork....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me why we still talking OT? It's not even a need for us.

Let me list needs in order:

(1) FS

(2) DT

(3) WR

(4) RG

(5) CB

(6) OT

I love Lewan in a situation if we could trade down and get a 2nd rd in return. But to just single handily take an OT in the 1st is NUTS!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me why we still talking OT? It's not even a need for us.

Let me list needs in order:

(1) FS

(2) DT

(3) WR

(4) RG

(5) CB

(6) OT

I love Lewan in a situation if we could trade down and get a 2nd rd in return. But to just single handily take an OT in the 1st is NUTS!

I can somewhat agree. I would say WR maybe Keenan Allen or Justin Hunter in the 1st

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: how is OT not a need might I ask??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am ALMOST as certain we're not taking a LT with our first pick in the draft as I was last year that we weren't going to take a MLB with our first pick...

Hopefully I'm right this time (not that I regret being wrong last time..).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me why we still talking OT? It's not even a need for us.

Let me list needs in order:

(1) FS

(2) DT

(3) WR

(4) RG

(5) CB

(6) OT

I love Lewan in a situation if we could trade down and get a 2nd rd in return. But to just single handily take an OT in the 1st is NUTS!

I think CB should be higher on that list

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're suppose to draft your tackles early on. Joeckel and Warmack are the only can't miss prospects as far as offensive linemen go, I'm not really interested in any other names at this point.

If we find ourselves in the 6-10th pick range, we need to look at Dee milliner, Sheldon Richardson, Jonathan Hankins, chance Warmack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me why we still talking OT? It's not even a need for us.

Let me list needs in order:

(1) FS

(2) DT

(3) WR

(4) RG

(5) CB

(6) OT

I love Lewan in a situation if we could trade down and get a 2nd rd in return. But to just single handily take an OT in the 1st is NUTS!

This.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: how is OT not a need might I ask??

Because Gross is playing well, as is Bell.

Seems simple from where I'm sitting.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites