Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

g5jamz

Union thugs gone wild. Sucker punch/rip down tent

83 posts in this topic

as long as that CHOICE. isn't to enter into an exclusive contract between union labor and employers. right-to-work negates that contract, but i guess government interference is a-ok here

not sure I follow you. Even in right to work states you are bound by the labor contract regardless of whether or not you pay dues or are in the union.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Free riders" are to assume people aren't capable of negotiating their own deals.

You must be a member of the collective to even have a job. Is that your opinion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see G5 is putting his "VoterID is totally needed and not discriminatory at all" logic to work on a new subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If unions really wanted to hurt people they'd hire the Pinkerton Detective Agency to do it for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AFP is funded by a couple multi-Millionaires, they preach a Conservative Message, but in reality they are just another Lobby group working for big $$$

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, people that can think halfway decently can figure it out.

You will just go on spouting whatever you spout so theres really no need for me to work on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure I follow you. Even in right to work states you are bound by the labor contract regardless of whether or not you pay dues or are in the union.

right to work negates the union's ability to collectively bargain, as people will simply opt out in hopes of continuing to receive the union's benefits.

why does the government have to step in and negate a contract between an employer and a collective of laborers? i thought republicans were all for that sort of thing. you know, laissez-faire, keep big gubmint out of my life

"right to work" is orwellian doublespeak. everyone should have the right to work at, at the least, a living wage. however, the republican version of "right to work" is simply "purposefully removing the ability to organize, and most certainly not guaranteeing any sort of actual right to work"

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites