Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER

government spending is out of control

7 posts in this topic

lol jk

In the short run, the two parties have run into an absurd standoff, where Republicans demand that President Obama produce an offer of higher spending cuts, and Obama replies that Republicans should say what spending cuts they want, and Republicans insist that Obama should try to guess what kind of spending cuts they would like.

Reporters are presenting this as a kind of negotiating problem, based on each side’s desire for the other to stick its neck out first. But it actually reflects a much more fundamental problem than that. Republicans think government spending is huge, but they can’t really identify ways they want to solve that problem, because government spending is not really huge. That is to say, on top of an ideological gulf between the two parties, we have an epistemological gulf. The Republican understanding of government spending is based on hazy, abstract notions that don’t match reality and can’t be translated into a workable program.

There really isn’t money to be cut everywhere. The United States spends way less money on social services than do other advanced countries, and even that low figure is inflated by our sky-high health-care prices. The retirement benefits to programs like Social Security are quite meager. Public infrastructure is grossly underfunded.

The Bowles-Simpson plan wound up punting on all the major questions because it simply couldn’t bridge that gulf between perception and reality. That’s why, in lieu of any ability to identify government functions to eliminate, the plan simply pretended the federal government could have everybody do a lot more work for less pay.

The real domestic savings in Bowles-Simpson came from building on Obamacare’s steps to save money by holding down the growth of health-care costs and to cut defense spending by pretty steep levels. But these turned out to be ideas that alienated rather than satisfied Republicans. So basically it turned out to be impossible to find real spending cuts that Republicans wanted.

When the only cuts on the table would inflict real harm on people with modest incomes and save small amounts of money, that is a sign that there’s just not much money to save. It’s not just that Republicans disagree with this; they don’t seem to understand it. The absence of a Republican spending proposal is not just a negotiating tactic but a howling void where a specific grasp of the role of government ought to be. And negotiating around that void is extremely hard to do. The spending cuts aren’t there because they can’t be found.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/12/why-republicans-cant-propose-spending-cuts.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me guess. This is an argument for higher taxes? Say it ain't so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posting the mock token response of what the op was expecting from his rep brethren.

Its called taking the venom out.

The economy is fine and there is nothing to tweak. Leave it alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody who says that government spending is not huge isn't paying attention.

Now, neither side may want to identify just where they want cuts because of their respective special interests, but we all know government spending, and government waste, are way out of control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Republicans promised increased defense spending if Romney won, I'm sure we are all glad we dodged that spending bullet

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeah those kids are really going to do a number on him!!!!   goodoleboy the goodoleracist
    • Cleveland Browns: Myles Garrett, DE San Francisco 49ers: Mitch Trubisky, QB Chicago Bears: Jamal Adams, S Jacksonville Jaguars: Leonard Fournette, RB Tennessee Titans: Marshon Lattimore, CB New York Jets: Patrick Mahomes, QB LA Chargers: Malik Hooker, S Carolina Panthers: Derek Barnett, DE Cincinnati Bengals: Garrett Bolles, OT Buffalo Bills: Deshaun Watson, QB New Orleans Saints Jonathan Allen DE Cleveland Browns: DeShone Kizer QB Arizona Cardinals: OJ Howard, TE Philadelphia Eagles: Christian McCaffrey, RB Indianapolis Colts: Reuben Foster, LB Baltimore Ravens: Solomon Thomas, DE Washington Redskins: Dalvin Cook, RB Tennessee Titans: Mike Williams, WR Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Taco Charlton, DE Denver Broncos: Ryan Ramczyk, OT Detroit Lions: Corey Davis, WR Miami Dolphins: Haason Reddick, OLB New York Giants: Marlon Humphrey, CB Oakland Raiders: Quincy Wilson, CB Houston Texans: Takkarist McKinley, OLB  Seattle Seahawks: Forrest Lamp. LT Kansas City Chiefs: Tim Williams, DE Dallas Cowboys: Jabril Peppers, S/LB Green Bay Packers: Malik McDowell, DE Pittsburgh Steelers: Evan Engram, TE  Atlanta Falcons       Budda Baker, FS New Orleans Saints  Gareon Conley, CB Cleveland Browns: Cam Robinson, OT San Francisco 49ers: Obi Melifonwu, S Jacksonville Jaguars: Charles Harris, DE Chicago Bears: David Njoku, TE LA Rams: John Ross, WR LA Chargers: Cooper Krupp, WR New York Jets: Antonio Garcia, OT Carolina Panthers: Zay Jones, WR Cincinnati Bengals:Teez Tabor, CB  New Orleans Saints: Juju Smith, WR  Philadelphia Eagles: TJ Watt, OLB Buffalo Bills: Curtis Samuel, WR Arizona Cardinals: Zach Cunningham, LB Indianapolis Colts: Desmond King, CB/FS Baltimore Ravens: Pat Elflein, C Minnesota Vikings: Dan Feeney, G Washington Redskins: Ryan Anderson, ILB Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Ethan Pocic, C Denver Broncos: Cleveland Browns: Detroit Lions: Miami Dolphins: New York Giants: Oakland Raiders: Houston Texans: Seattle Seahawks: Kansas City Chiefs: Dallas Cowboys: Green Bay Packers: Pittsburgh Steelers: Atlanta Falcons: Carolina Panthers: @LinvilleGorge you are on the clock with the Denver Broncos