Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Cam lost his monkey....


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1 il Malocchio

il Malocchio

    formerly j2sgam...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,024 posts
  • Locationtryin to figure it out...

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:18 AM

..looked & did not see this discussed. Cam has got rid of the monkey on his back. Mr.Newton threw a pick late in the game and the Panthers won. The team stuck together regardless of how dejected young Cameron looked. I, for one, am thrilled to have this mark behind him and us. I was so over hearing that stat repeated, fellin like Cam knew it & couldnt get past it. It is just a feeling of relief to know that now Cam knows he can get past picks...

Apologies if there is already a thread...

#2 beach

beach

    |~~~~|

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,332 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:19 AM

Didn't see a thread about it either. Good thing that's behind him now.

Next step/for next year: some game winning drives in these close games

#3 0115

0115

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 715 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:40 AM

A new season awaits. However, I hope that he continues to press forward with diligence, when facing adversity.

#4 PhillyB

PhillyB

    that jungle football

  • ALL-PRO
  • 20,058 posts
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:41 AM

the entire team has turned a corner in terms of confidence over the last handful of games

#5 fieryprophet

fieryprophet

    WARNING: Do not annoy!

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,215 posts
  • LocationLa Grange, NC

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:45 AM

1-18 when your QB has a turnover is just a sad, sad stat.

#6 0115

0115

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 715 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:48 AM

1-18 when your QB has a single turnover is just a sad, sad stat.



Need clarification on your statement. Meaning the QB's fault or the team as whole for not finishing games?

#7 fieryprophet

fieryprophet

    WARNING: Do not annoy!

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,215 posts
  • LocationLa Grange, NC

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:49 AM

Just wanted to clarify. Meaning the QB's fault or the team as whole for not finishing games?


The team. No one can expect the QB to play perfect every single game just to win. I've said elsewhere, but Rodgers, Manning, Brees, etc. would all have sub-.500 careers if this same thing occurred to them.

#8 CARuthless

CARuthless

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 364 posts
  • LocationTampa Bay

Posted 26 December 2012 - 12:07 PM

Ya but the turnover differential was even Leinart threw a pick too. I think it would be a bigger step forward for us to lose the turnover battle and still come out with a W.

#9 fieryprophet

fieryprophet

    WARNING: Do not annoy!

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,215 posts
  • LocationLa Grange, NC

Posted 26 December 2012 - 12:30 PM

Ya but the turnover differential was even Leinart threw a pick too. I think it would be a bigger step forward for us to lose the turnover battle and still come out with a W.


We did, Joe Adams fumbled.

#10 The_Mango55

The_Mango55

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,257 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 12:31 PM

Ya but the turnover differential was even Leinart threw a pick too. I think it would be a bigger step forward for us to lose the turnover battle and still come out with a W.


Maybe, but I would rather just win the turnover battle and win the game every time.



#11 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,750 posts
  • LocationCape Fear Area

Posted 26 December 2012 - 01:54 PM

At any rate, Cam is the new Chuck Norris

#12 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    That wasn't a Penalty.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,811 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:45 PM

It was against the lowly Raiders, but I'll take it.

#13 footballisasport

footballisasport

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,334 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 05:41 PM

1-18 when your QB has a turnover is just a sad, sad stat.


I don't normally disagree with a lot of your posts but, No.. A "sad stat" is when your team is so undisciplined that some fans and the media won't call out the team but continue to push the lie that their QB not playing a perfect game week in and out, means doom for the team.

If a QB's INTS meant instant team lose then how come the Bengals are in the play-offs despite Andy having more Ints than Cam? How Come the Colts are in the play-offs despite Luck having more ints than Dalton?

Only with Cam is all this BS believed...Gee I wonder why?

#14 footballisasport

footballisasport

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,334 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 05:53 PM

The team. No one can expect the QB to play perfect every single game just to win. I've said elsewhere, but Rodgers, Manning, Brees, etc. would all have sub-.500 careers if this same thing occurred to them.


You are right. And what is so funny and no one has ever called him on it, is how much Brees loves to pad his stats by trying to get as many passing yardages out of a game. Even when he throws like 5 picks or the teams loses, Brees stat is still up there. Amazing how no one every calls him out on how much he loves to protect his own franchise, himself, like Brett Farve but last season folks were actually accusing Cam of being "me first" when he broke Peyton Manning's passing yard record.

#15 Panths

Panths

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 726 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 06:07 PM

Cam's mental state still crumbled after his INT. Fortunately for us the D held together and we were also playing the Raiders.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com